Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

jamf · 04-29-2005, 11:26 PM

i agree with pretty much every thing.
But
we run into the same problem gibbs'sessesssss scheme ran into last year; you cant stretch the field sending two WR's and a H-Back downfield. when the redskins put 3 wr's and sent portis in a route, the line folded and the quarterback got killed(or brunell couragously tossed the ball to the waterboy)

here is what is probably going to happen; teams will put 3 DB's on our 3 WR's. then they will use 1 or 2 LB's on our HBack and/or TE. the remaining guys go after the QB. if they can get pressure with those 5 guys, we are screwed(in the same position as last season). but if we can block those guys, any qb in the league will be able to pick the defence apart.

if bugal can create new blocking schemes for todays defences, we should have an exciting season.

04-29-2005, 11:26 PM	#4
jamf Pro Bowl Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: San Diego Ca Posts: 5,427	Re: Receivers i agree with pretty much every thing. But we run into the same problem gibbs'sessesssss scheme ran into last year; you cant stretch the field sending two WR's and a H-Back downfield. when the redskins put 3 wr's and sent portis in a route, the line folded and the quarterback got killed(or brunell couragously tossed the ball to the waterboy) here is what is probably going to happen; teams will put 3 DB's on our 3 WR's. then they will use 1 or 2 LB's on our HBack and/or TE. the remaining guys go after the QB. if they can get pressure with those 5 guys, we are screwed(in the same position as last season). but if we can block those guys, any qb in the league will be able to pick the defence apart. if bugal can create new blocking schemes for todays defences, we should have an exciting season.