Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

Defensewins · 04-30-2005, 10:10 AM

Our current receivers will do just fine. We American sports fans must be really bored, because we get way too caught with numbers and stats. 'This WR is 6' 4" so he will be better than the 5' 9" WR.'
That is all a bunch a of crap. I don't care if NFC east teams have big recievers, the 3x champion New England Patriots have a bunch of Smurf receivers and they seem to be doing ok. The superbowl MVP is a WR (Deion Branch) that is 5' 9" with his cleats on. The Eagles could not cover him. Both tall and short WR have their advantages and disadvantages, the good one's just know how to better use the strengths.
I really think the main reason(s) our offense suffered last year was due to our QB play and new offensive system. Not because our WR were so terrible.

04-30-2005, 10:10 AM	#10
Defensewins Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Houston, Texas Posts: 3,767	Re: Receivers Our current receivers will do just fine. We American sports fans must be really bored, because we get way too caught with numbers and stats. 'This WR is 6' 4" so he will be better than the 5' 9" WR.' That is all a bunch a of crap. I don't care if NFC east teams have big recievers, the 3x champion New England Patriots have a bunch of Smurf receivers and they seem to be doing ok. The superbowl MVP is a WR (Deion Branch) that is 5' 9" with his cleats on. The Eagles could not cover him. Both tall and short WR have their advantages and disadvantages, the good one's just know how to better use the strengths. I really think the main reason(s) our offense suffered last year was due to our QB play and new offensive system. Not because our WR were so terrible.