[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

I'm not understanding how him owning stock has anything to do with his principles or what he stands for. Owning stock doesn't mean he doesn't want to limit corporate greed or get corporate America out of our government. Corporations aren't evil, and I'm quite positive he doesn't think so either. So the stuff you posted is 110% irrelevant to his qualifications and his stances on the issues.

Owning stock has nothing to do with his principles? Nader making a conscience choice to be a part owner of a monopolistic company (as of 2001, 25% of his stocks were in Cisco) when he publicly opposed monopolistic practices is indicative of nothing?

Got it - you believe a candidate's hypocrisy is irrelevant to their qualifications to hold office. I will note that down for future reference.