Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins
NFL Stats: by Player Category
Actually Rex finished 18th in terms of NFL QBs. They generally rank them based on yardage. So you want to use the QB rating to show how awful Rex was, yet when I use them, it's "stretching and twisting"?
|
Um yeah, YOU need to listen to your own advice.
Rex finished 18th when sorted for yardage.
He's 28th when sorted for QB rating.
Quote:
|
I don't even need to address this.
|
You don't need to address it because
you suggested it, not me.
Quote:
|
Jake Locker. Picked ahead of us in 1st round.
|
True, but if you consider trading up an option you can count him, I don't but since you mentioned it.
Quote:
|
Andy Dalton. Picked ahead of us in 2nd round.
|
But, he was an option they just chose not draft him in the 1st or were unable or unwilling to trade up for him in the second.
Quote:
|
So again, WHAT options were there? There were none. But if it suits you hatters all the more, keep on believing there were.
|
Hello?
Here is the list for the last time:
Every QB that was available in FA that finished better then 28th in NFL (e.g. Matt Moore, Alex Smith etc)
Every QB in the draft after Newton and Locker (e.g. Dalton to TJ Yates etc)
Every tradeable journeymen QB (e.g. Matt Flynn, Joe Webb etc)
All the QBs that fall into those groups mentioned above would make up the list.
To sum:
Every team that has better QB play(which is roughly 29 teams) made a more successful offseason decision at the QB position.
Even the 3 teams with worse QB play (Rams, Colts and Jags) arguably still are better off.
Unless your ready to write off a QB after less then 2 seasons the Rams and Jags have their QBs of the future.
And the Colts have changed from Painter to Dan Orlovsky who has a higher rating the Rex.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
In an effort to not sidetrack this thread anymore we can agree to disagree.
You think choosing Rex and Beck was a good decision I don't.
Can we discuss Flynn?