Quote:
Originally Posted by mlmpetert
Over paying via Danny's money is entirely differnt then over paying via draft picks and/or players. If GB franchises Flynn and wants to trade him ill be the first one that jumps off of the Flynn bandwagon.
I think the best interest for our team would be to sign a FA QB with a lot of potential (like Flynn) and do pretty much everything that 44Deezel said. We still draft another QB. Who knows, maybe well get real lucky and have RGIII fall to us at 6. If so we still draft him and have both Flynn and RGIII on board, if not well at least we didnt give away the farm to move up 3 spots to get an unproven rookie.
What we should all like the most about Flynn is that he gives us a lot of flexability. But if GB puts the frachise tag on him, his value dimishes greatly in my eyes.
|
Regardless of what GB does we shouldn't go after him. Way too much risk involved here. As I said, someone's going to have to pay him 40 million. It's going to be a bidding war. Give up a draft pick and over pay cause GB is going to want compensation...and or what? Two starts? No thanks. This has Kevin Kolb written all over it. Let's go get our own guy in the draft. This is a deep class and we should be able to get a guy in the 2nd round that has more potential than Flynn. The guy on A&M? Foles?