Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins
The other two were trades where they had 0 leverage so the pick was devalued. Now you have a situation where there are multiple teams wanting the pick, and without the huge contracts that rookies used to get. That pick has now become more valuable than it was prior.
2012 -1st
2012-3rd
2012- 4th
2013-1st
2013- 5th
----------------------------
2012-1st
2012-2nd
2013- 1st
2013- 4th
---------------
My scenario was a estimation, and it wasn't overblown that much even though you think it is. I can see several packages like the one above given for that pick.
The Panther's traded their 2010 1st rounder for a 2009 2nd round pick (43rd) worth 470 points.
You want to know why it cost the Chargers so much to move from #3 to #2? It was because of the person at stake. At the time, Leaf was perceived to have a higher ceiling than Peyton.
Fast forward to now. RGIII is also being touted as a top prospect along with Luck and is said to have a higher ceiling. He's obviously good enough for Irsay to mention both him and Luck.
Put that #2 up for bid, and the price could sky rocket if teams start a bidding war. If you want to argue about me adding an additional 4th or 5th to the chart, than by all means haggle away. It was a rough estimate, but it was enough to show that we dont' want to give up that much for one guy.
|
To be clear on what this was- I said I thought you were guessing high on the trade price, you said it
wasn't a guess, it was the cost based on previous trades and the value chart. And now, several posts later, we get that you
are guessing that it will be more than recent trades and the value chart. Fine, it is your guess, nothing wrong with that. Just wish it didn't take so long to get back there.
John Clayton was just on the radio and his guess was that it might cost the Redskins two firsts and another pick for Griffin (after he talked about how much smarter a move he thought that was than signing Manning, and how he felt Griffin was a perfect fit for Shanahan's offense).