Quote:
Originally Posted by biffle
And RG3 is a full 14 years younger. The decision should really be made on him alone. If the team believes he is going to be a great QB, then they should do what it takes to get him. Peyton Manning shouldn't even enter into that decision. He should be considered only if the decision on Griffin is made in the negative.
|
And to this point, this line of thinking could not possibly be more shortsighted. You cannot make a QB decision like this in a vacuum. The fact of the matter is that you're not just talking about Griffin vs Manning, as someone else pointed out way earlier in this thread, you're talking about
:
Manning + retaining 6 overall + retaining whatever other picks it would take to trade up for Griffin + the ability to spend 3 years finding a QB of the future
vs
Griffin
Again, I'm leaving cap room out of the equation because we're nowhere near the limit. It's not even a constraint for the Redskins.
If you ignore the downstream impact of making each move then you're not really managing the team, it's more of a fantasy football approach.