Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post - Do you guys think ramsey the answer at qb

Daseal · 06-13-2005, 09:49 PM

I tend to agree with Offiss on this. Though Brunell was an idiotic pickup to begin with between his contract and the draft pick, I think he's better than what he looked like. Granted the line looked like a seive for the first few games, I don't think Brunell really knew what Gibbs wanted to do, I think he'd be better if he played today, but I don't think that great.
Mark Brunell JAC 484 82 54 2 0 65 89.7
484 yards in 3 games isn't bad at all. If he kept on pace he would have had 2581 yards for the year. When you have a RB like Fred Taylor to bang it in you probably won't throw for a lot of TDs. A 66% completion rate is pretty solid too. That's a lot to lose in a year.

06-13-2005, 09:49 PM	#52
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 8,341	Re: Do you guys think ramsey the answer at qb I tend to agree with Offiss on this. Though Brunell was an idiotic pickup to begin with between his contract and the draft pick, I think he's better than what he looked like. Granted the line looked like a seive for the first few games, I don't think Brunell really knew what Gibbs wanted to do, I think he'd be better if he played today, but I don't think that great. Mark Brunell JAC 484 82 54 2 0 65 89.7 484 yards in 3 games isn't bad at all. If he kept on pace he would have had 2581 yards for the year. When you have a RB like Fred Taylor to bang it in you probably won't throw for a lot of TDs. A 66% completion rate is pretty solid too. That's a lot to lose in a year. __________________ Best. Player. Available.