View Single Post
Old 03-01-2012, 09:49 PM   #15
skinster
Impact Rookie
 
skinster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 754
Re: Replace underperformers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyCanuck View Post
Well said. Agreed.
Its no burden, I agree, but ditching it creates opportunities to upgrade in greater areas of need. More cap room is never a bad thing when you have alot of holes to fill. TE is not a hole with davis, and I highly doubt Cooley will be here much longer after this year.

Also there is the (hypothetical) potential for his cap number to hinder us from making a move we want to next year through shaving off 2 mil from the possibility of us cutting him then.
skinster is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.73325 seconds with 10 queries