Quote:
Originally Posted by artmonkforhallofamein07
What we have been fed in the media, and what we have seen here in DC, is our offense is more of a MS scheme then KS.
In Houston, KS's offense required the QB to throw the ball down field out of the pocket predominantly rather than throwing outside the pocket by design?
So what is our philosophy? How does KS run our system correctly if he has his own way of doing things?
|
Mike and Kyle run the same offense in terms of verbiage and overall 'playbook'.
Kyle learned from Houston under Kubiak who learned from Mike in Denver.
But, to sum it up in football philosophy I think Mike can be considered more of balanced (which today would probably be considered run heavy) playcaller and Kyle is closer to pass heavy play caller.
Mike has a much greater emphasis and calls a more diverse running game then Kyle.
Mike's was more diverse of course the staple was zone runs but it also featured traps, draws, tosses.
Kyle's running game was very basic: inside zone/out side zone.
Its wasn't until week 12ish that Kyle added and began featuring the toss/pitch as his main weapon in the ground game.
Mike's emphasis on the run creates favorable passing match-ups because the emphasis on the run
dictates coverages.
And creates a bunch of easy big play completions almost every game.
Mike also moved the pocket more not just play-action based rollouts and bootlegs but non-playaction dash outs and sprint outs.
The result was an offense that featured well defined and often half-field reads.
The result was an offense easy to execute for the QB.
Kyle's offense is pass first.(and there's nothing wrong with that I'm not saying that Kyle is a bad playcaller. I'm pointing out the difference is their playcalling as I see it.)
In Kyle short career his pass/run ratio is 60/40. (2010 it was actually less then 60/40)
Kyle's offense is more of a straight drop back 5 step passing game.
There is more onus on the QB dropping back and reading out full field progressions.
Its a more QB decision making intensive offense.
Those differences are the big ones that jump out to me.
I think its pretty much moot because IF they sign Peyton Manning they should in essence run 'Peyton Manning/Colt's offense' or else what's the point?
Peyton and Kyle sitdown and discuss their plan of action for the offense but the passing game specifically.
Peyton discussing how the playcalling and audible system worked.
They discuss concepts and translate the core concepts of the Colt's offense into our/Kyle's offense verbiage.