Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus
Instead of giving up 3 #1's and a #2, I'd have stayed at 6 and taken Tannehill.
|
In all honesty, I happen to prefer what the Redskins actually did to taking Tannehill at six.
But I have to be right about BOTH Griffin AND Tannehill. If not right about both, then I am wrong about preferring this trade.
If Griffin isn't the clear no. 1 on the depth chart in 2014 for whatever reason and Tannehill is starting in this league, this will be the worst trade in modern NFL history, and what Shanahan will ultimately be remembered for, instead of the super bowls.
So yeah, this is very much going all-in. Recklessly all-in.