Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
It's funny how there's several articles and posts that say the trade for the 2nd pick is risky. Gambles are considered risky by how much that can be potentially lost. What exactly can the redskins say they have right now that they would be losing?
They've been near the bottom of the division nearly every year. In order to turn things around they needed to take that chance and overpay. I consider it bold rather than risky.
Last edited by warriorzpath; 03-11-2012 at 07:01 PM.
|