Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII
and I would be fine with them denying the contracts because of the way they were structured. But they didn't did they? Why? Because then it would have proven the owners were breaking the law.
|
You keep saying that, but the League has a solid argument that they weren't breaking the law.
They would also argue that they only dealt with it now for convenience reasons.
The Commissioner may be guilty of a ridiculous process, and unfairly singling (doubling?) out two teams, but the NFL Bylaws use the phrase "The Commissioner may...in his sole discretion..." a whole lot. Everything else is covered with "by the affirmative votes of not less than three-quarters...of the member clubs..."
It sucks, it's unfair, but "in his sole discretion" means "in his sole discretion."