Quote:
Originally Posted by HoopheadVII
You keep saying that, but the League has a solid argument that they weren't breaking the law.
They would also argue that they only dealt with it now for convenience reasons.
The Commissioner may be guilty of a ridiculous process, and unfairly singling (doubling?) out two teams, but the NFL Bylaws use the phrase "The Commissioner may...in his sole discretion..." a whole lot. Everything else is covered with "by the affirmative votes of not less than three-quarters...of the member clubs..."
It sucks, it's unfair, but "in his sole discretion" means "in his sole discretion."
|
No it doesn't. There's a reason every league gets taken to court by it's teams and players (and quite often loses). It's because you can put those kind of phrases into your bylaws all you want, but your members still have a right to be treated fairly and to seek redress if not.
In this case, Goodell tried to overrule the CBA, which he has absolutely no power to do.