Quote:
Originally Posted by HoopheadVII
Thank you for the nice words.
Teams that underspent had the right to do so - I believe no salary cap meant no salary floor either.
I'll have to look for the details of Peppers contract, but I think I saw somewhere that the original numbers in the oft-seen graphic are incorrect.
On the last part, I'm sure they can complain all they want, but acting like a whiny two-year old towards a powerful Commissioner probably does more harm than good.
In the end, it's a club of 32 competitors that hired a Commissioner and gave him strong powers to settle disputes between them (and actually get things done.) Ultimately, he reports to the group of 32. Individuals can whine to him, but he answers to the 32.
|
Well, I don't mean just the Peppers deal, but there are a number just like him.
So basically we're saying, "We got punished. Teams who underspent didn't. Tough shit."?
That's what makes me think that it might be an ugly route to take, but if arbitration isn't satisfactory, legal proceedings might be the only avenue.