Quote:
Originally Posted by biffle
I think these are the real Peppers' numbers:
https://twitter.com/#!/Adam_Schefter/status/10190771133
Here is the contract Dallas was punished for giving to Miles Austin:
Why Miles Austin's contract doesn't hurt Cowboys | Dallas Cowboys Blog | Sports News | News for Dallas, Texas | The Dallas Morning News
For comparison, Chicago allocated 20 mil of the cap hit in Peppers' contract into 2010, while he averaged 12.8 mil per year afterward.
Dallas allocated 17.078 in 2010, while Austin averaged 6.7 afterward.
It's pretty clear they both did the same thing, while Dallas did it to a slightly larger extent. But Dallas was hit with a 10 mil cap penalty, while Chicago is rewarded with an extra 1.6 mil in cap space.
Why? I would think this is going to be a major question that comes up in any proceedings. My guess at the answer is that Dallas spent a lot more money in 2010, but that isn't supposed to be an issue. So, it would be interesting to hear how Goodell and Mara answered that. |
As far as I can tell, Peppers was paid $20m in 2010 - 6.5 signing bonus and 13.5 salary and other bonuses. Signing bonus hits the cap evenly over 5 years, the rest hits in 2010.
In 2011, salary = 900k and roster bonus = 10.5m
A drop in salary and non-signing bonus from 13.5m in 2010 to 11.4 in 2011 is
less than 30%, and therefore OK.
Bears can pull the plug on Peppers after one year | ProFootballTalk