Quote:
Originally Posted by HoopheadVII
The removing Dan Snyder as owner is a joke - I'm stuck hoping for either that or him being forced to sell as part of a divorce settlement a la the Dodgers.
As for the #2 pick, no way they take that. They could take other picks, and the point is that the League has Snyder by the balls in this situation.
And the real point is that the League doesn't live by normal rules. In joining the club, they have granted significant power to a Commissioner and are ultimately subject to a 3/4 majority.
|
So you agree,
1) there is no way that Snyder is gone (not really even a funny joke, just a lame old rehash)
2) we aren't losing the #2 pick
So really it's just bickering about the fact that the league has a strong oversight mechanism.
In most cases that mechanism works fine, simply because it is a small group and everyone needs to parlay support at one point in time. No big deal, and the 3/4's is a super majority needed to sustain any type of decision. If something else were to come before them in that circle, that didn't have an already filed arbitration brief, I am certain that the vote would be much less unanimous. I think the fact that even the Saints and Raiders approved it, when they were somewhat punished, shows that there was more at play than just the merits of the case.