View Single Post
Old 05-07-2012, 03:35 PM   #8
fanarchist
Special Teams
 
fanarchist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 109
Re: RGIII Named Starter

Quote:
Originally Posted by imaskin4life View Post
Even though we have a quality backup it would be a mistake to depend on the option because of the high injury risk. I think it could be used effectively as long as RG3 is not taking a lot of hits.
Just to clarify. I'm not saying we should use the option as our primary package, or alter the system completely, but instead offer more option looks to disturb defensives predictive abilities. I don't believe the option will be used (if it is at all), as a systemic staple. Moreover what I was eluding to in saying it's a hopeful prospect applies more to the coaching staffs willingness to adopt a less popular package in order to facilitate, and reinforce the strengths of the personel. The hopefulness spawns from the logic that this microcosm could eventually permeate the overall mentality.
fanarchist is offline  

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.35919 seconds with 10 queries