Quote:
Originally Posted by HailGreen28
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but the fox link doesn't talk about jobs going overseas, it talks about jobs lost, which your links don't refute.
|
Oh my god, are you really going to argue semantics now? Jobs being shipped overseas is jobs lost in America. They'd have to lay off people in America just to give jobs to somebody overseas. It's job loss.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HailGreen28
Which agrees with the Fox article. What did they "distort" or "exaggerate" in this case?
|
No, it doesn't. Him sharing a concern isn't him agreeing with Fox.
Quote:
The spin is that there will be tremendous job loss and reduction in R&D despite the significant increase in numbers of people covered by healthcare in the United States.
|
In other words, he's saying that this tax isn't going to matter really because the number of people covered by the new health insurance which will ultimately increase revenues!!!! Significant increase is the actual word he used.
Here is exactly what Fox said.
Quote:
Several companies have already responded to the looming tax by cutting research and development budgets and laying off workers.
|
No. No way companies are laying off people or cutting R&D due to the looming tax. If anything, they are using this as an excuse like many companies like to do. Hrmm...how do I cut my work force, and push the extra work onto others without looking like the bad guy? Oh, I know, I'll just claim this new tax is going to kill my profits!!
Since you want to argue semantics, Fox's title is this
"Five major ObamaCare taxes that will hit your wallet in 2013" is misleading and false as well. Notice the word WILL, and not the word COULD. Distorting? Yes. Misleading? Yes. False? Yes.
There are many medical devices that aren't being taxed. So this tax isn't going to affect everybody's wallet. Not everybody will need to buy a medical device that's being taxed. Hey, not according to Fox!!
Source2:
Quote:
Spending on taxable medical devices represents less than 1 percent of total personal health expenditures, so a small increase in their price would have an almost imperceptible effect on health insurance premiums.
|
Listen, we aren't going to agree on this, so you keep believing Fox and I'll chose not to. That we can agree on.