Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

JWsleep · 08-16-2005, 02:06 PM

On the long drive that McNabb scored on, the iggles looked very good, I thought. In fact, their first-team offense looked better than Pitts, minus that first interception. But Pitt was missing lots of starters, and no doubt the D's (both of them excellent last year) weren't showing much. But McNabb moved the ball well--the young receivers in there are better than Pinkston and Freddie--they have a rookie and a second year guy. Both kinda in the TO mold--big, strong, etc. Philly does not need TO.

08-16-2005, 02:06 PM	#16
JWsleep Propane and propane accessories Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Houston, TX Age: 57 Posts: 4,719	Re: Pitt vs Philly on ESPN On the long drive that McNabb scored on, the iggles looked very good, I thought. In fact, their first-team offense looked better than Pitts, minus that first interception. But Pitt was missing lots of starters, and no doubt the D's (both of them excellent last year) weren't showing much. But McNabb moved the ball well--the young receivers in there are better than Pinkston and Freddie--they have a rookie and a second year guy. Both kinda in the TO mold--big, strong, etc. Philly does not need TO. __________________ Hail from Houston!