Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus
You have more than implied that the pistol is a play. You have presumed it in repeated posts, including the very post here.
For the last time, the pistol can be run without the QB EVER keeping the ball (I repeat, EVER). The pistol in no way prima facie presumes that the QB will keep the ball at any % above zero. Thus the concerns you expressed in your post are completely moot.
You can only make the argument that you make above if the pistol is a play - which it is not.
Goat, I have responded to your posts when others have ignored you in the hope that you will come around to seeing things clearly. Now I'm done.
|
Again, nobody has debated whether you can use the pistol without the QB ever keeping the ball. The debate is whether it can be effective without the QB ever keeping the ball. Looking at the data, successful use of the pistol formation thus far is limited to offenses where the QB indeed keeps the ball X number of times in a game, you cannot possibly believe the debate is settled.
I think maybe where you got confused (starting in another thread) is when I compared the initial success of the Wildcat, as something new defenses had to adjust for, to the emergence of the pistol as something new defenses have to adjust for? My post was probably lazy and resulted in your confusion.