![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools
![]() |
Display Modes
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,114
|
Kenny Pickett , Matt Corall, & Sam Howell
The experts say none of them are worthy of going in the first round. But at least one of them will be a 1st round pick. But how much of an upgrade are either of these young quarterbacks are an upgrade over Taylor Heinicke ?
__________________
Touchdown Washington Redskins!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#2 |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,542
|
Re: Kenny Pickett , Matt Corall, & Sam Howell
80 year old Joe Namath would be an improvement over Heinicke. You need more than moxie.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,740
|
Re: Kenny Pickett , Matt Corall, & Sam Howell
Willis is the only guy I'd target at 11 or higher.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,114
|
Re: Kenny Pickett , Matt Corall, & Sam Howell
But Pickett is projected as the most pro ready.....
__________________
Touchdown Washington Redskins!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 877
|
Re: Kenny Pickett , Matt Corall, & Sam Howell
As a UNC Tarheel fan, I watched a lot of Howell...and I would take him over signing Trubisky. They made Sam run an odd offense where they ran him like he was Michael Vick at times and he's not that, but he is mobile and strong...and he's got a big arm to stretch the field. I really think he will make a good pro QB. I think Pickett has the same potential too, he caught my eye 2 years ago while watching him play against the Tarheels, you could tell he was better than most. Don't know much about Corall...but I did hear he has dealt with depression and alcohol, so this may not be the franchise for him.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Playmaker
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Age: 36
Posts: 3,499
|
Re: Kenny Pickett , Matt Corall, & Sam Howell
Take my opinion with grain of salt since I don't watch college games and I watched youtube highlights. But I really like Howell - he has big arm and can move around well.
I saw one mock where we traded down in the draft and then drafted Howell in late 1st round - I would love this move. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,740
|
Re: Kenny Pickett , Matt Corall, & Sam Howell
I think Willis has the higher ceiling with his overall athleticism, Pickett probably has a higher floor.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,325
|
Re: Kenny Pickett , Matt Corall, & Sam Howell
Quote:
You're drafting for need and you need a QB. Don't get mixed up in all this "How much better" BS. Draft the best QB available no matter what till you get it right. QB value is higher than any other position by far. give me anyone except for that dude with baby hands. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
The Starter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK, South
Posts: 1,926
|
Re: Kenny Pickett , Matt Corall, & Sam Howell
Experts? There is anything but consensus among experts, on Pickett particularly some say he is a 1st round pick. Not high first round picks granted, but this is rather a large generalisation none the less. QB is a high value position and like any resource they are worth whatever someone is willing to give up for them. 3 or 4 teams will deem them worthy
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 877
|
Re: Kenny Pickett , Matt Corall, & Sam Howell
I'm leaning this way myself, and I am a Sam Howell fan...to me the deciding factor would be on whatever tests they do to determine their "QB smarts"...and who knows if any of OUR guys even know how to test for that. But I'm definitely in the camp that would rather just draft one of these guys and roll with him vs any of the free agent/trade QBs outside of AR, RW, & DW.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,174
|
Re: Kenny Pickett , Matt Corall, & Sam Howell
Matt corral has no meat on his body at all... Dude will get killed in the NFL unless he jacks up, plus he's been hurt in 2 straight seasons.
Picketts gloves freak me out and he has a limited arm. Willis has the upside but hes so raw Howell is a Baker Mayfield type of QB.. Looks great some games and very avg others
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
From a Land Down Under
![]() Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 53
Posts: 23,839
|
Kenny Pickett , Matt Corall, & Sam Howell
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Playmaker
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Age: 36
Posts: 3,499
|
Re: Kenny Pickett , Matt Corall, & Sam Howell
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,439
|
Re: Kenny Pickett , Matt Corall, & Sam Howell
All three of these guys, and Willis, are rolls of the dice.
Pickett maybe a little bit more likely to at least turn into a passable starter, and Willis a bit more likely to boom or bust. But all are a roll of the dice. I wouldn't be against going for one, but I'd probably sign a vet too. If I'm resigned to dice-rolls, I'd rather have a couple cracks at it. Trubisky or Mariota carry about as much a chance of hitting as these guys do. I'll take one from column A and one from column B. But I'd much rather trade a butt ton for Wilson or Watson, if I can.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,635
|
Re: Kenny Pickett , Matt Corall, & Sam Howell
I can't get real excited about any of these guys. This coming year, neither would be an upgrade to what we have now. Might as well roll with TH <-----which I am not advocating for.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|