|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
03-09-2006, 12:34 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West VA
Posts: 726
|
Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
I was disappointed with all the hype about Nemo last year that he never played. Now, Rock has re-signed. We again have Rock, Betts, and Portis. So is Nemo gonna play or get cut?
|
03-09-2006, 12:36 PM | #2 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ZOMGZZZ!!111
Age: 32
Posts: 1,160
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
i think we hang onto all of them. rock was a good specail teams guy.
__________________
143 lbs of twisted steel and sex appeal. |
03-09-2006, 12:52 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West VA
Posts: 726
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
Yeah, but don't we usually just have 3 active roster spots for RBs? I like Rock, Im glad we resigned him, but my guess is Nemo is gone without ever playing.
|
03-09-2006, 12:53 PM | #4 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Potomac Falls, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 1,762
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
If we don't keep em all on the active roster, maybe one makes the practice squad.
|
03-09-2006, 06:35 PM | #5 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 53
Posts: 3,048
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
Quote:
They like Rock because he's apparently a monster in practice. Gibbs says that he (Cartwright) often admonishes his teammates to work harder during drills, etc. Thrash is in the same category. I would be surprised if Thrash were cut, as some here have suggested.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven |
|
03-09-2006, 12:55 PM | #6 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: IOWA
Age: 42
Posts: 1,324
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
At what point can you no longer bury a guy on the practice squad??
__________________
No pressure, no diamonds. |
03-09-2006, 12:56 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West VA
Posts: 726
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
Can you put a guy on the practice squad 2 years in a row? Nemo was on the practice squad last year wasn't he?
|
03-09-2006, 01:00 PM | #8 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
Two years on PS is fine, I think o going into the third year is a no-no.
|
03-09-2006, 01:10 PM | #9 |
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
Nemo will probably end up on the practice squad.
|
03-09-2006, 01:20 PM | #10 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
I like what Rock brings to the table. He is great on special teams and when he is called on to run the ball has done pretty good. I tried to look up his stats as a RB but they do not have any posted for him at NFLplayer.com. It just seems from what I can remember that when he is call on and gets more than a few carries he has some decent numbers.
I found his stats carrier average 4.5 and last year 7.5 maybe we need to get him more involved in our game planing. Betts carrier average is 4.0 and last year averaged 3.8. |
03-09-2006, 01:45 PM | #11 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
Would it be fair to say that if Nemo is relegated to the practice squad again this upcoming season, and is unable to jump past Rock that he's another mid round draft pick gone awry?
|
03-09-2006, 02:01 PM | #12 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
Quote:
of course, he could still prove to be good enough to keep around as well. If we don't keep him after this year, i'm sure he'll be able to stay in the league as a #2/#3 for a while. |
|
03-09-2006, 03:18 PM | #13 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
Quote:
|
|
03-09-2006, 03:44 PM | #14 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 473
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
with lumsford in the mix, I imagine it will have to be worked out in training camp. Rock is a gamer.
|
03-09-2006, 03:02 PM | #15 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 380
|
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?
Nemo is more of a Clydesdale. Portis/Betts are more Thourobreds (sic).
I really expected to see Nemo active more for short yardage situations. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|