Pathetic!

saden1 · 10-17-2004, 06:55 PM

I'm not liking this....not one bit. Brunell is done...he has no rhythm or timing with receivers and he is getting the receivers killed out there...better make the switch while we have the bye week. The Redskins are obviously broke. Gibbs better be having the offense working during the bye week. No reset for them till the balls are zipping and on the spot to the receivers. We couldn't dominate the 27th ranked defense in the league for fuck sake. That's just pathetic.

RedskinRat · 10-17-2004, 06:59 PM

Saden1, when I'm agreeing with you it's a dark day indeed. I'm agreeing with you.

Brunell bring absolutely nothing, I'm sure he's a nice guy but he's holding the whole team back.

diehardskin2982 · 10-17-2004, 07:00 PM

ouch doggie, maybe brunnel will realize he sucks and fake injury.

aehs77 · 10-17-2004, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diehardskin2982

ouch doggie, maybe brunnel will realize he sucks and fake injury.

Maybe sean taylor will realize he sucks and give him one

ArringtonRules · 10-17-2004, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saden1

I'm not liking this....not one bit. Brunell is done...he has no rhythm or timing with receivers and he is getting the receivers killed out there...better make the switch while we have the bye week. The Redskins are obviously broke. Gibbs better be having the offense working during the bye week. No reset for them till the balls are zipping and on the spot to the receivers. We couldn't dominate the 27th ranked defense in the league for fuck sake. That's just pathetic.

Well I'm sad to report after hearing the press conference after the game, Gibbs did'nt seem to find anything wrong with Brunell.. I hope he breaks down the film and realizes that this guys cannot throw deep and most NFL secondary right now DON'T RESPECT our passing game.
Today we had protection, and a good running game and we were playing the Bears who's secondary is not great and BRUNELL CAN'T EVEN COMPLETE HALF of his passes!! Gibbs need to rethink 'cause if our offense keeps on giving opposing teams so many chances and defense on the field for that long WE R GONNA LOSE..
C'MONS GIBBS MAKE THE CHANGE!!!

Bozzy · 10-17-2004, 07:25 PM

Once again Snyder fucked up the QB situation. He did it before by bringing in Jeff George, and he did it again by bring in Brunell. Dan sure is the man.

Skinsgirl · 10-18-2004, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bozzy

Once again Snyder fucked up the QB situation. He did it before by bringing in Jeff George, and he did it again by bring in Brunell. Dan sure is the man.

Sorry Brunnel is Joe's hand-picked man.

How long is his contract?

skinsguy · 10-18-2004, 05:42 PM

You people have to learn paitence. With yesterday's game I noticed that playing calling has improved (because Gibbs is the man when it comes to adjustments!!!) and Portis played much better. I thnk Gibbs realized that having more "Clinton Portis" designed plays in there gave him loads of confidence and looked how it payed off! Clinton was also gaining more yards via the counter gap. If our run game continues to improve, it is going to take loads of pressure off of the passing game and in fact it will open up the passing game more. Teams are going to have to bring up more guys to plug the holes which will get the receivers downfield open! Now, MB getting the ball to those receivers is one thing, BUT the running game is what usually sets up the passing game in Gibbs' system, so we are starting to see that come together. I think we have a pretty decent chance against the Packers...even though the Packers might be slowly getting themselves out of their hole, I feel we can score against their defense! It would be nice to get another win before we play Philly, because we need the confidence.

MTK · 10-17-2004, 07:30 PM

Brunell is Gibbs guy, let's lay off Snyder

wbecker999 · 10-17-2004, 07:37 PM

We need a time machine to go back to the draft and get Rothlisburger

aehs77 · 10-17-2004, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wbecker999

We need a time machine to go back to the draft and get Rothlisburger

As long as we have that time machine out we might as well go back a couple years and draft tom brady.

or maybe we could just keep stephen davis and not trade the best corner in the league for another back who doesn't fit the system.

Gmanc711 · 10-17-2004, 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aehs77

As long as we have that time machine out we might as well go back a couple years and draft tom brady.

or maybe we could just keep stephen davis and not trade the best corner in the league for another back who doesn't fit the system.

Maybe the system needs to fit the running back, like it did today. They totaly changed some of the plays they used Portis on and it showed. They need to adapt the system to Portis like they did today and they will be successfull.

MTK · 10-17-2004, 07:38 PM

I'll stick with Taylor over Roethisberger

Paintrain · 10-17-2004, 07:53 PM

I have to question Gibbs on this one.. It's obvious to everyone but him that Brunell isn't the answer. 13 points against the Bears when Portis gained 171? C'mon, I understand loyalty, but this is 2 games under 100 yards passing and less than 50% completion percentage. At least Ramsey will be able to do better than that.

offiss · 10-17-2004, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paintrain

I have to question Gibbs on this one.. It's obvious to everyone but him that Brunell isn't the answer. 13 points against the Bears when Portis gained 171? C'mon, I understand loyalty, but this is 2 games under 100 yards passing and less than 50% completion percentage. At least Ramsey will be able to do better than that.

Agreed! Although I missed today's game I saw some highlights, Portis, wow! Heck of a game, I heard a commentater say the skin's changed their running scheme a bit, is that true? I did see the highlight of Brunell throwing the ball out of bound's when he had I believe it was Coles wide open down the sideline for a TD, as well I see he gave up another TD, 28 point's in 5 1/2 games, I wonder if that's some kind of record? I am now becoming very incouraged thinking how good we can be with Ramsey in there? He will make play's, and he will only get better, Brunell has to go, we can't afford to drop 1 more game because of his inability at QB, I heard a post game comment that we absolutly dominated this game, if that's true, then it's an absolute joke that the bear's had an opportunity to tie, or beat us, with their last possesion, especially when Portis ran for over 170yds., no more excuses for Brunell, and how he need's a running game, he had one and failed miserably, our defense bailed him out big time!

10-17-2004, 06:55 PM	#1
saden1 MVP Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 45 Posts: 10,069	Pathetic! I'm not liking this....not one bit. Brunell is done...he has no rhythm or timing with receivers and he is getting the receivers killed out there...better make the switch while we have the bye week. The Redskins are obviously broke. Gibbs better be having the offense working during the bye week. No reset for them till the balls are zipping and on the spot to the receivers. We couldn't dominate the 27th ranked defense in the league for fuck sake. That's just pathetic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

10-17-2004, 06:59 PM	#2
RedskinRat Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: I'm in LA, trick! Posts: 8,700	Saden1, when I'm agreeing with you it's a dark day indeed. I'm agreeing with you. Brunell bring absolutely nothing, I'm sure he's a nice guy but he's holding the whole team back.

10-17-2004, 07:00 PM	#3
diehardskin2982 Another Year, another mess. Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,581	ouch doggie, maybe brunnel will realize he sucks and fake injury.

10-17-2004, 07:25 PM	#6
Bozzy The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 44 Posts: 1,034	Once again Snyder fucked up the QB situation. He did it before by bringing in Jeff George, and he did it again by bring in Brunell. Dan sure is the man.

10-18-2004, 05:42 PM	#8
skinsguy Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Greensboro, North Carolina Posts: 6,766	You people have to learn paitence. With yesterday's game I noticed that playing calling has improved (because Gibbs is the man when it comes to adjustments!!!) and Portis played much better. I thnk Gibbs realized that having more "Clinton Portis" designed plays in there gave him loads of confidence and looked how it payed off! Clinton was also gaining more yards via the counter gap. If our run game continues to improve, it is going to take loads of pressure off of the passing game and in fact it will open up the passing game more. Teams are going to have to bring up more guys to plug the holes which will get the receivers downfield open! Now, MB getting the ball to those receivers is one thing, BUT the running game is what usually sets up the passing game in Gibbs' system, so we are starting to see that come together. I think we have a pretty decent chance against the Packers...even though the Packers might be slowly getting themselves out of their hole, I feel we can score against their defense! It would be nice to get another win before we play Philly, because we need the confidence.

10-17-2004, 07:30 PM	#9
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,518	Brunell is Gibbs guy, let's lay off Snyder

10-17-2004, 07:37 PM	#10
wbecker999 Camp Scrub Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Iowa Age: 49 Posts: 93	We need a time machine to go back to the draft and get Rothlisburger

10-17-2004, 07:38 PM	#13
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,518	I'll stick with Taylor over Roethisberger

10-17-2004, 07:53 PM	#14
Paintrain Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL Age: 54 Posts: 5,006	I have to question Gibbs on this one.. It's obvious to everyone but him that Brunell isn't the answer. 13 points against the Bears when Portis gained 171? C'mon, I understand loyalty, but this is 2 games under 100 yards passing and less than 50% completion percentage. At least Ramsey will be able to do better than that.

Pathetic!

Locker Room Main Forum