|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
03-16-2005, 09:40 PM
|
#1 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rockville
Age: 61
Posts: 795
|
2007 Uncapped Year
Based on this article in SI it sure looks like this scenario will play out.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...tes/index.html
__________________
16-0 for 2007 |
|
|
|
03-16-2005, 11:52 PM
|
#2 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
This is interesting stuff, and someone should post a reply so I might as well be the first...
I have nothing to say. Need to read more about the situation but I just can't see them going to an uncapped year. There's no turning back after that
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
03-16-2005, 11:54 PM
|
#3 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 1,515
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
I would love to comment on the article, as it appeared to be interesting. But after 10 PM, my ADD really kicks in, and I realize that i cant see more than 6 months into the future.
|
|
|
|
|
03-16-2005, 11:57 PM
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
The NFLPA had an "uncapped situation" as soon as the Federal Judge ruled that the NFL "limited free agency" was illegal. The NFLPA negotiated away that status in favor of the cap situation. People need to go back and read that last sentence one more time so they might understand the history of the salary cap that exists now.
It is rhetorical flourish to say that if the NFL "ever went uncapped" there is no turning back. They turned back once before and they can do it again. There IS a Redskin danger here. Given the propsect of an uncapped year, imagine the spending binge that Danny Boy will undertake. Then they will need to conform to a cap. Can you say "Salary Cap Hell"?
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
|
|
|
|
03-17-2005, 12:03 AM
|
#5 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
Quote:
LDS: We'll pay you $50 million this year, thoughwe'll be deferring most of that, and league minimum for the next seven years. What do you say?
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2005, 01:17 AM
|
#6 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
Quote:
Curmudgeon, I'm guessing what you were referring to was Plan B Free Agency right? But I must say I didn't realize that there was a cap before then. I thought the cap came after the judge ruled Plan B illegal
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2005, 10:55 AM
|
#7 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
We could also dump Brunell in '07 (if he's not already gone) and take the cap 'hit' then too.
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you." |
|
|
|
|
03-17-2005, 10:57 AM
|
#8 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
Quote:
So interested in acquiring players that I forgot about cleaning house.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2005, 11:10 AM
|
#9 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,385
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
Dump Brunell in the uncapped year?! Brilliant.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2005, 12:04 PM
|
#10 | |
|
\m/
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
Quote:
I think Canuck said that it's likely we'll see Brunell cut after June 1 next year. |
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2005, 02:14 PM
|
#11 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 36.28 x 76.22
Age: 73
Posts: 1,812
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
Nah! Brunnell will be here for the entire HOF Coach Gibbs tenure! After all, he saved his life during their first meeting!
__________________
'37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship! |
|
|
|
|
03-17-2005, 01:36 AM
|
#12 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
From the article:
Quote:
Forbes : NFL Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2005, 01:42 AM
|
#13 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
Or maybe the want to add up the total teams' revenue and then divide that number by 32 teams and then multiply that number by 64%. If this is what they want then the salary cap would jump to 106.6 million (5330 billion / 32 * 0.64) based on current figures.
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2005, 01:52 AM
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
Quote:
2-0 in strike year's baby!:headbange |
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2005, 02:30 AM
|
#15 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 389
|
Re: 2007 Uncapped Year
Any huge increase like what the PFA are looking for will just cause more problems . There are two caps in football the calculated salary cap enforced by the NFL and then the actual amount of money teams can afford to pay out . This would lead to a situation of a splitting fo the teams between the haves and have nots .
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
