Dissed on SNF

mattdouthat · 09-26-2005, 10:04 AM

Did anyone else cath them say where only 4 undefeated teams and the showed a graphic listing
Buccaneers 3-0
Colts 3-0
Bengal 3-0
Chiefs 2-0
They even said are only 4 undefeateds left.
I almost threw remote through screen Theisman was sitin right there and said nothing. Just wondering if anyone else saw it.

Hog1 · 09-26-2005, 10:08 AM

I did not see that, but I did see a couple of pre-game shows who were asking the question "of the 2-0 teams, which would most likely not make the playoffs"? Unfortunately, we were named each time!

gortiz · 09-26-2005, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mattdouthat

Did anyone else cath them say where only 4 undefeated teams and the showed a graphic listing
Buccaneers 3-0
Colts 3-0
Bengal 3-0
Chiefs 2-0
They even said are only 4 undefeateds left.
I almost threw remote through screen Theisman was sitin right there and said nothing. Just wondering if anyone else saw it.

THATS SO FUNNY! :headbange I saw and reacted the exact same way ... I was thinking they were talking about teams playing in week 3, but who knows...

MTK · 09-26-2005, 10:21 AM

I saw that, I was like uhh hello?!

TheMalcolmConnection · 09-26-2005, 10:32 AM

ME TOO! I wanted to post that today. I was like, "Dude, WTF."

jbcjr14 · 09-26-2005, 10:37 AM

If we get to 3-0 this week, then there will be some talk. Gotta win this week at home, the crowd has to bring it again like they did in week 1.

Hog1 · 09-26-2005, 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jbcjr14

If we get to 3-0 this week, then there will be some talk. Gotta win this week at home, the crowd has to bring it again like they did in week 1.

If we get to 3-0, you will see people (non-fans) starting to get on the wagon

dblanch66 · 09-26-2005, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog1

If we get to 3-0, you will see people (non-fans) starting to get on the wagon

Agreed. But I still think the media will play it down. I look forward to 4-0. THAT'S when Gibbs will start to become "Gibbs" again to these pundits in the media. Jackasses.

Sociofan · 09-26-2005, 10:45 AM

I'm betting that even with a win in Week 3, there will still be no love for the Skins. Maybe that's a good thing. Maybe it will keep a chip on their shoulder throughout the season.

But let's face it; these are the same clowns who had Arizona (0-3) winning the NFC West. And had Oakland (0-3) as the team to beat in the AFC West. Miami (2-1) was supposed to be the pathetic basement dweller of the AFC East. How much credibility should we give them for picking playoff teams after 3 weeks? They get paid simply to run their mouths about football and act surprised when nothing they predicted goes right. The Skins get paid to win football games no matter how ugly it might seem. Guess who's doing the better job?

PSUSkinsFan21 · 09-26-2005, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sociofan

I'm betting that even with a win in Week 3, there will still be no love for the Skins. Maybe that's a good thing. Maybe it will keep a chip on their shoulder throughout the season.

But let's face it; these are the same clowns who had Arizona (0-3) winning the NFC West. And had Oakland (0-3) as the team to beat in the AFC West. Miami (2-1) was supposed to be the pathetic basement dweller of the AFC East. How much credibility should we give them for picking playoff teams after 3 weeks? They get paid simply to run their mouths about football and act surprised when nothing they predicted goes right. The Skins get paid to win football games no matter how ugly it might seem. Guess who's doing the better job?

Awesome post.

SUNRA · 09-26-2005, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sociofan

I'm betting that even with a win in Week 3, there will still be no love for the Skins. Maybe that's a good thing. Maybe it will keep a chip on their shoulder throughout the season.

But let's face it; these are the same clowns who had Arizona (0-3) winning the NFC West. And had Oakland (0-3) as the team to beat in the AFC West. Miami (2-1) was supposed to be the pathetic basement dweller of the AFC East. How much credibility should we give them for picking playoff teams after 3 weeks? They get paid simply to run their mouths about football and act surprised when nothing they predicted goes right. The Skins get paid to win football games no matter how ugly it might seem. Guess who's doing the better job?

I think we've been down this road before. If we get pass Kansas City, Denver, Giants and Eagles we deserve respect. Our divison games are key to getting the respect we deserve.

Gmanc711 · 09-26-2005, 11:02 AM

Yeah I saw that. Whatever, but it really dosent help anyones opinion of a biasness against the skins in the media. Whatever, after were 3-0 maybe they will know.

Daseal · 09-26-2005, 11:11 AM

You think if we had the same schedule as Oakland we'd still be undefeated? Oakland got robbed in KC last Monday, and they've played suprisingly well, IMO.

I thought the same thing but I guess the bye week kinda messing with us in that graphic. Until we actually put a game away and win it hands down I doubt we'll get much respect. I really couldn't care less as long as the W column is getting full.

redrock-skins · 09-26-2005, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daseal

You think if we had the same schedule as Oakland we'd still be undefeated? Oakland got robbed in KC last Monday, and they've played suprisingly well, IMO.

I thought the same thing but I guess the bye week kinda messing with us in that graphic. Until we actually put a game away and win it hands down I doubt we'll get much respect. I really couldn't care less as long as the W column is getting full.

Correct. Winning will shut a lot of people up and get us noticed. The win over Dallas was great, but truthfully, we have a long way to go to prove the naysayers wrong. I can't really blame any commentator for saying we're most likely not to make the playoffs. Do we really look like a playoff team yet?

VTSkins897 · 09-26-2005, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daseal

You think if we had the same schedule as Oakland we'd still be undefeated? Oakland got robbed in KC last Monday, and they've played suprisingly well, IMO.

I thought the same thing but I guess the bye week kinda messing with us in that graphic. Until we actually put a game away and win it hands down I doubt we'll get much respect. I really couldn't care less as long as the W column is getting full.

i agree OAK has played 3 games against 3 tough teams and come close each time. they might be the best winless team out there.

09-26-2005, 10:04 AM	#1
mattdouthat Camp Scrub Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 50	Dissed on SNF Did anyone else cath them say where only 4 undefeated teams and the showed a graphic listing Buccaneers 3-0 Colts 3-0 Bengal 3-0 Chiefs 2-0 They even said are only 4 undefeateds left. I almost threw remote through screen Theisman was sitin right there and said nothing. Just wondering if anyone else saw it.

09-26-2005, 10:08 AM	#2
Hog1 Quietly Dominating the East Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Naples, Florida Posts: 10,675	Re: Dissed on SNF I did not see that, but I did see a couple of pre-game shows who were asking the question "of the 2-0 teams, which would most likely not make the playoffs"? Unfortunately, we were named each time!

09-26-2005, 10:21 AM	#4
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,518	Re: Dissed on SNF I saw that, I was like uhh hello?! __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

09-26-2005, 10:32 AM	#5
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: Dissed on SNF ME TOO! I wanted to post that today. I was like, "Dude, WTF." __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

09-26-2005, 10:37 AM	#6
jbcjr14 The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Austin, Texas Age: 54 Posts: 2,015	Re: Dissed on SNF If we get to 3-0 this week, then there will be some talk. Gotta win this week at home, the crowd has to bring it again like they did in week 1. __________________ "Work Harder: millions on welfare are counting on you" - Obama 2009 address to Congress.

09-26-2005, 10:45 AM	#9
Sociofan Special Teams Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Gainesville, VA Age: 59 Posts: 380	Re: Dissed on SNF I'm betting that even with a win in Week 3, there will still be no love for the Skins. Maybe that's a good thing. Maybe it will keep a chip on their shoulder throughout the season. But let's face it; these are the same clowns who had Arizona (0-3) winning the NFC West. And had Oakland (0-3) as the team to beat in the AFC West. Miami (2-1) was supposed to be the pathetic basement dweller of the AFC East. How much credibility should we give them for picking playoff teams after 3 weeks? They get paid simply to run their mouths about football and act surprised when nothing they predicted goes right. The Skins get paid to win football games no matter how ugly it might seem. Guess who's doing the better job?

09-26-2005, 11:02 AM	#12
Gmanc711 Thank You, Sean. Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Gaithersburg, MD Age: 39 Posts: 7,506	Re: Dissed on SNF Yeah I saw that. Whatever, but it really dosent help anyones opinion of a biasness against the skins in the media. Whatever, after were 3-0 maybe they will know. __________________ #21

09-26-2005, 11:11 AM	#13
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 41 Posts: 8,341	Re: Dissed on SNF You think if we had the same schedule as Oakland we'd still be undefeated? Oakland got robbed in KC last Monday, and they've played suprisingly well, IMO. I thought the same thing but I guess the bye week kinda messing with us in that graphic. Until we actually put a game away and win it hands down I doubt we'll get much respect. I really couldn't care less as long as the W column is getting full. __________________ Best. Player. Available.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Dissed on SNF

Locker Room Main Forum