Redskins Notes (3/22)

[That Guy]

Redskins | Team still under the salary cap
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:44:46 -0800
David Elfin, of the Washington Times, reports after numerous signings and contract changes, the Washington Redskins' salary cap number is at $97.574 million, leaving $4.426 million to spend on signing their draft picks and filling other needs.

Redskins | Team will visit with K. Wright
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:35:22 -0800
David Elfin, of the Washington Times, reports the Washington Redskins will visit with free agent CB Kenny Wright (Jaguars) Wednesday, March 22.



so if we want to sign lloyd (1.5-2mill), 3 backups and a #2 with some low picks, someone is probably going to have to restructure.



K Wright is 6'1" and a good tackling CB. not a blazer, but he'd be a good #3.

[EEich]

Lloyd is already signed for this year... they're trying to sign him to an extension.

[Twilbert07]

(Please read with a Jim Mora voice) Draft picks? Draft picks? What draft picks?

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by EEich

Lloyd is already signed for this year... they're trying to sign him to an extension.

thats what i meant. I doubt they're going to leave him on a one year deal though unless they REALLY have questions about his character (and if they did, why give up draft picks for him?)

[dmek25]

if k wright is a good tackling corner,he is definitly a step above w harris already

[Beemnseven]

Originally Posted by dmek25

if k wright is a good tackling corner,he is definitly a step above w harris already

The problem with Walt Harris wasn't tackling, it was with pass coverage.

[scowan]

The Skins don't need much money for draft picks. They will need to spend some on their #2, but then they jump to 4's 5's and 6 round picks. Some of those late round picks won't make the team anyway. They are in good shape. I would think they are looking at how they can keep costs down on what will be back-ups at this point.

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by scowan

The Skins don't need much money for draft picks. They will need to spend some on their #2, but then they jump to 4's 5's and 6 round picks. Some of those late round picks won't make the team anyway. They are in good shape. I would think they are looking at how they can keep costs down on what will be back-ups at this point.

no 4's. 2,5,6,6,6,7,(+projected 7 comp)

[scowan]

Originally Posted by That Guy

no 4's. 2,5,6,6,6,7,(+projected 7 comp)

That Guy, thanks for setting me straight on our picks. Wow, our coaches don't even need to show up much on that first day (Saturday) of the draft. Maybe we can trade that 2nd round pick for a good OLB or OL and then they can take the day off and wait for Sunday!

[MTK]

Originally Posted by That Guy

no 4's. 2,5,6,6,6,7,(+projected 7 comp)

I can definitely see us trading some of those picks to move up a bit.

[Beemnseven]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I can definitely see us trading some of those picks to move up a bit.

What would three 6th round picks be worth? A third? I doubt it.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

What would three 6th round picks be worth? A third? I doubt it.

Of course not, I'm not talking about a huge trade up, but they'll probably do something like package 2 6th rounders for a 5th, or a 5th and a 6th for a 4th.

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

What would three 6th round picks be worth? A third? I doubt it.

draft pick trade value chart:
http://www.thehuddlereport.com/Nicke...valuechart.htm
-not definitive for all trades, but it is a good idea of general pick value.

NFL draft order:
http://nfl.com/draft/story/9137410
-there are 3 teams at 10-6 and they pick 20, 21, and 22nd in every round. We start with the 22nd pick, because we had the hardest strength of schedule, but every round teams with even records cycle. for example, we're pick 22 in the 3rd, but in the 2nd we cycle up to pick 21, then in the 3rd we cycle up again to pick 20. In the 4th, we go back to the bottom of the 10-6 teams and pick 22nd again.

without comp picks included we have picks 53, 149, 164, 180, 187, and 214.

Projected comp picks:
http://www.kffl.com/forums/showthrea...ght=COMP+PICKS
-this guy is really good and comp picks have to be factored into trade value. Even though comp picks cannot be traded, they lower the value of EVERY tradeable pick in and below the 4th round.


round 1 -> 32 picks (0 comp) (1-32)
round 2 -> 32 picks (0 comp) (32-64)
round 3 -> 33 picks (1 comp) (65-97)
round 4 -> 37 picks (5 comp) (98-134)
round 5 -> 38 picks (6 comp) (135-172)
round 6 -> 36 picks (4 comp) (173-208)
round 7 -> 48 picks (16 comp) (209-256)


we have: (left most number is trade value, followed by overall draft position)
VAL, OVR, pick info
370., 053, rnd 2 pick 21
30.4, 155, rnd 5 pick 21
22.0, 176, rnd 6 pick 4 (jets, ramsey)
15.6, 192, rnd 6 pick 20
12.8, 199, rnd 6 pick 27 (panthers, gardner)
2.40, 230, rnd 7 pick 22
N/A , 249, rnd 7 pick 41 (of 48) (comp)

totalled up that's 453.2 for everything, or 83.2 for our day 2 picks.

that's enough to trade everything to move up 8 spots to pick #45or trade the 3 6s for a 4th rounder, near pick 19.

It's probably better to just sit pat and take whoever is available and hope with 6 low picks 1 turns out to be a winner.

[amorentz]

That Guy -- I like how youve been posting these "Redskins Notes" daily. Its much appreciated, thanks!

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by amorentz

That Guy -- I like how youve been posting these "Redskins Notes" daily. Its much appreciated, thanks!

no problem they're in the FA thread, but i figure people don't read those, so redskin stuff should get a bit more attention.