|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
11-22-2006, 03:05 PM | #1 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 170
|
Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
Ok i haven't heard anyone talk about this angle on the T.J. Duckect trade.
I hate to bring more bad news to this nightmare season but here it goes. from Greatbluedraft report it explains that if our first round picks are signifficantly different than Denver we would exchange them check it out. Great Blue North Draft Report if the season ended we would be like pick 5-6 and they are at about 28. Id say thats signifficant. If this happens I think whoever is in charge of player management needs to be fired. Even if it doesnt they need to be fired for stupidity. Denver must be laughing at us soo hard right now!
__________________
good news for people who like bad news |
11-22-2006, 03:07 PM | #2 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 170
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
sorry it posted twice
__________________
good news for people who like bad news |
11-22-2006, 03:13 PM | #3 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 1,851
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
F*&k !!!!!!!!!!
__________________
Catch me on YouTube ! http://www.youtube.com/user/DowntimeRB?feature=mhw5 The "punishment" by the league : "It's like getting a ticket for going too fast on a road a week ago and they changed the speed limit today" |
11-22-2006, 03:14 PM | #4 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 39
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
Gay town!!!!
|
11-22-2006, 03:26 PM | #5 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 46
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
Quote:
|
|
11-22-2006, 03:29 PM | #6 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
I'm thoroughly confused about this.
|
11-22-2006, 03:49 PM | #7 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 890
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
|
11-22-2006, 03:55 PM | #8 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
Am I in a time-warp? Isn't this issue like 6 months old?
|
11-22-2006, 04:03 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 293
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
Heres what happens:
If we end up with a pick that is anywhere near denvers pick we exchange, for instance, if we ended up with the 21st pick and denver had the 29th we would exchange to make up for the duckett deal, we owe denver 260 points on the draft value chart, since we most likely will end up with a top 5 pick or top 10 pick we will not exchange picks because it will go way over the value we owe them, so most likely the difference will be made up with our 5th round pick in 07' and our 3rd in 08', so dont worry about exchanging picks with denver in the first round, there is absolutely no chance this will happen. |
11-25-2006, 03:31 PM | #10 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Venice Beach, CA
Age: 52
Posts: 345
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
Quote:
|
|
11-22-2006, 04:09 PM | #11 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
If we are the 7th pick or better in the 3rd round, that is all we have to give them
__________________
|
11-23-2006, 07:26 AM | #12 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Fayettenam, NC
Age: 52
Posts: 806
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
Our front office is a joke. Even if its only a 3rd round pick it wasnt worth it. The trade for TJ shows how panic stricken Danny and Vinny were when portis got hurt. We need to pursue a full time general manager. These thing might not happen with this much regularity if we had proven a Gm. The Danny proved how little he knew about personnel decisions in 2000 and Vinny and Gibbs proved how little they know about personnel decisions this season. If you look at the teams that are consistent in the NFL they dont have big free agent spending sprees and dont trade away draft picks.
__________________
The future is obviously right now! |
11-23-2006, 02:16 PM | #13 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,343
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
Quote:
|
|
11-24-2006, 06:59 AM | #14 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Fayettenam, NC
Age: 52
Posts: 806
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
You keep on living in your fantasy world. If you think snyder has no input you have another thing coming. He is in on everything......just remember the decision makers for this franchise they go in this order snyder, gibbs, cerrato. Snyder holds the tie breaking vote. So you do the math on that one.
__________________
The future is obviously right now! |
11-24-2006, 08:32 AM | #15 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
|
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!
Quote:
Seriously, stop with the Snyder bashing. All the evidence that is available to us indicates that Snyder has bent over backwards to accomidate our revered HOF coach. There are only a few owners in this league I would rather have controlling my team than him. He wants to win and will pony up amounts of money for that that no one else will. The reasons for this team's lack of success have had less to do with him every year since 2000, and I would argue, nothing to do with him this year. |
|
|
|