Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive woes

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-04-2006, 04:03 PM   #1
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive woes

This has been mentioned in several threads across the board, but I thought it was important to organize the thoughts. I feel that the offense struggled to be consistent because of two main things.
1-
After the first quarter it seems that the Falcons figured out how to stop our offense, pressure JC. After a while they figured out how to stuff the run, and forced us into passing downs. It seemed like on every passing play, especially 3rd and longs, they brought the house, and JC looked like a deer in the headlights.

Not adjusting to this was Saunders biggest mistake IMO. He should have changed things so that JC would have more protection when passing, especially on third downs.

He also ran play action way too much, and JC was getting hammer right after he faked the handoff. I understand why he did that, seeing that we were running all over them. But after a couple failed PA passes, he should have tried to straight pass to give Campbell more time. Of course this isn't all his fault, because Campbell is a young QB, and even he has admitted it takes him a while to make his reads. Either way, Saunders should have adjusted based on Campbell's skill level.

2-
It seems like everyone is ready to blame Gibbs/Saunders when Campbell didn't have a great game. Of course we shouldn't expect him to be amazing, but that doesn't mean we absolve him of all blame. He had three basic errors.

a)His selection of passes were very predictable, and almost Brunell-like. He went Moss nine times I think, going 7-9. While his percentage with other recievers was quite low. Cooley did drop a few, so that is not Campbell's fault, but other passes were simply bad. They were off target, low, etc. Some of this is due to pressure but some are just a young QB's errors. He threw to a double covered Moss once, when he wasn't under pressure.

b)Campbell took too many steps back, instead of releasing quickly. This is a combination of the playcalling and Campbell being uncomfortable. Saunders should have told him to do quick three step drops, but at the same time if he isn't yet comfortable doing so, how can Saunders force him to? I think he is taking 7 step drops because he is still young, and he feels he needs time and space to read the D. 2-3 step passes may be a bit too quick for him.

c)The windup. Yes I said it. He takes a bit too long to release the throw. I expect this to be changed in the offseason, and I don't expect or want it to be fixed now. JC is just throwing how he feels is best. Nevertheless, the extra half second it takes him to windup can easily be the difference between a TD and a sack.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 04:14 PM   #2
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w

Thoughts?
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 03:02 PM   #3
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
Thoughts?


The amount of steps the QB takes in his drop is predicated on the design of the play. Some plays call for a three step drop, and others may call for anything from a five to seven step drop. However many steps the play calls for, you must have protection beyond a couple seconds. Jason Campbell got in trouble a couple times Sunday because the backs in the backfield were not efficient at picking up the blitz. There's no way you can throw it if you don't have time, and by Jason being young, he panicked, tried to make something happen, and wound up making a costly mistake.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2006, 04:23 PM   #4
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
Thoughts?
What about how low Campbell has to squat under center? That has to slow him down even more. He has to go from that position into his back pedal, and then the long wind up to pass the ball. The pass protection has to be perfect to allow that much time from Center - QB exchange to Campbell passing.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2006, 04:48 PM   #5
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy View Post
What about how low Campbell has to squat under center? That has to slow him down even more. He has to go from that position into his back pedal, and then the long wind up to pass the ball. The pass protection has to be perfect to allow that much time from Center - QB exchange to Campbell passing.
I noticed that too, and I realize he is tall, but I have never seen tall QBs squatting like they are gonna take a dump.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2006, 05:10 PM   #6
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
I noticed that too, and I realize he is tall, but I have never seen tall QBs squatting like they are gonna take a dump.
Doug Williams was tall and never had to squat that low...and he had a similar wind up. I wonder if there is anyway of training Casey to not squat so low or if maybe he is just a short guy to begin with? Brunell had the same problem as well.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 05:47 AM   #7
railcon56
Impact Rookie
 
railcon56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 922
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy View Post
Doug Williams was tall and never had to squat that low...and he had a similar wind up. I wonder if there is anyway of training Casey to not squat so low or if maybe he is just a short guy to begin with? Brunell had the same problem as well.
maybe a lower center makes for a better snap/exchange?
__________________
Run or Pass and Score ..We Want Alot More!!!!
railcon56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 04:20 PM   #8
Luxorreb
^21^
 
Luxorreb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Age: 52
Posts: 1,630
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w

well said hooskins. I was at the game and noticed his long drops every time he passed the ball. And by the end of the game the defense was cluing on that.
__________________
^21^
Luxorreb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 04:26 PM   #9
The Zimmermans
Impact Rookie
 
The Zimmermans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 40
Posts: 937
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luxorreb View Post
well said hooskins. I was at the game and noticed his long drops every time he passed the ball. And by the end of the game the defense was cluing on that.
haha yeah, it's almost like we need a combination of brunell and campbell, cause now campbell is struggling on the short quick throws that brunell made so effortlessly. JK, but seriously, we only threw that slant rout once, we needed to utilize that on third down when they were sending all their linebackers.
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure
The Zimmermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 04:23 PM   #10
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w

The lack of good protection is what was most obvious to me. Too often he had guys running at him totally unblocked. That's a tough task for any QB let alone an inexperienced one.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 01:01 PM   #11
JGisLordOfTheRings
Playmaker
 
JGisLordOfTheRings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond VA
Age: 38
Posts: 2,583
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
The lack of good protection is what was most obvious to me. Too often he had guys running at him totally unblocked. That's a tough task for any QB let alone an inexperienced one.

AMEN! What's the point in wanting your QB to do well and pass well if you aren't going to try and protect him? Lets face it. We miss Portis. Betts is good, dont get me wrong, he had a great GAME. He doesnt block as well as Portis does and that hurts. Just please guys, give JC a little time. He's young and getting a little wiser I think, even though its hard to say that after the 1st Int he threw. Regardless, protect JC, end of story.
__________________
The redskins pocket is like my love life.....nonexistent and disappointing. -OnceWeWereKings
JGisLordOfTheRings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 01:29 PM   #12
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w

Quote:
Originally Posted by JGisLordOfTheRings View Post
AMEN! What's the point in wanting your QB to do well and pass well if you aren't going to try and protect him? Lets face it. We miss Portis. Betts is good, dont get me wrong, he had a great GAME. He doesnt block as well as Portis does and that hurts. Just please guys, give JC a little time. He's young and getting a little wiser I think, even though its hard to say that after the 1st Int he threw. Regardless, protect JC, end of story.
I don't think people are done with Campbell lol. He is the future and we know he has potential. But that doesn't mean you baby him and not point out his flaws.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 02:44 PM   #13
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
The lack of good protection is what was most obvious to me. Too often he had guys running at him totally unblocked. That's a tough task for any QB let alone an inexperienced one.


That's where we miss Portis in the backfield, and Betts shows his liability, a couple of plays in Sunday's game is an example of what I'm talking about.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2006, 04:11 PM   #14
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longtimefan View Post
That's where we miss Portis in the backfield, and Betts shows his liability, a couple of plays in Sunday's game is an example of what I'm talking about.
Yeah I agree, most people dont realize how good Portis actually is.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2006, 04:49 PM   #15
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w

.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.80070 seconds with 10 queries