What Big Name On Defense Is Most Likely To Be Gone???

NFLNetwork · 01-04-2007, 04:57 PM

I know Wynn and Daniels will prob get the boot, but what about some big names. Particulary Washington, Griffin, Springs. AA is prob gone..so exempt him.

hurrykaine · 01-04-2007, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NFLNetwork

I know Wynn and Daniels will prob get the boot, but what about some big names. Particulary Washington, Griffin, Springs. AA is prob gone..so exempt him.

I hope Springs re-works his deal - there was an article a few weeks ago stating how they would like to work in Springs at safety in certain defensive packages next year, which makes me think he will be back. If he doesn't agree to restructure, Springs is certainly gone.

I would hope Griffin would be back as well. There is no way they let M. Washington go.

Schneed10 · 01-04-2007, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hurrykaine

I hope Springs re-works his deal - there was an article a few weeks ago stating how they would like to work in Springs at safety in certain defensive packages next year, which makes me think he will be back. If he doesn't agree to restructure, Springs is certainly gone.

I would hope Griffin would be back as well. There is no way they let M. Washington go.

No, if Springs does not restructure, the Redskins' incentive would be to keep him. If he doesn't restructure, he'll count $7.3 million against the cap. If they cut him, he'll count $7.4 million against it. There's no savings for cutting him.

But there's no reason he wouldn't restructure. He's not going to care how he gets his money, as long as he gets it.

djnemo65 · 01-09-2007, 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hurrykaine

I hope Springs re-works his deal - there was an article a few weeks ago stating how they would like to work in Springs at safety in certain defensive packages next year, which makes me think he will be back. If he doesn't agree to restructure, Springs is certainly gone.

I would hope Griffin would be back as well. There is no way they let M. Washington go.

I heard someone saying, and I think it was JLC, that Springs moving to safety was not something that would happen next season, but rather, down the line. So I think Springs is the correct answer given his cap number and injury history, even though I'd love to see them find a way to keep him. He's a true competitor who loves this team as much as we do.

TheMalcolmConnection · 01-04-2007, 05:12 PM

Yeah, I'm leaning towards Springs leaving myself.

jbcjr14 · 01-04-2007, 05:19 PM

Of that group I would say Springs. But I don't think he leaves unless he is unwilling to restructure his deal. You have to keep the heart of your defense (Griff and Washington). It's the Redskins FO, who the hell really knows what they are thinking!

MTK · 01-04-2007, 05:20 PM

Wynn and Daniels both have to be on the hotseat due to their age and contracts. I think Springs will be back with a restructured deal.

Schneed10 · 01-04-2007, 05:23 PM

The only way Springs leaves is if he's the deepthroat and GW finds out.

Schneed10 · 01-04-2007, 05:26 PM

Wynn would represent a savings of $2.5 million if we cut him. They will certainly try to force him to accept a paycut, and they'll have leverage because he's not worth what his current contract says he is. If he doesn't accept the paycut, they'll axe him.

On Daniels, he would represent a $1.9 million savings if we cut him. But I can't see them cutting both Daniels and Wynn. That would leave us really thin at DE.

I can only see one or the other being gone at most, and quite honestly I think both will be back.

MTK · 01-04-2007, 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Wynn would represent a savings of $2.5 million if we cut him. They will certainly try to force him to accept a paycut, and they'll have leverage because he's not worth what his current contract says he is. If he doesn't accept the paycut, they'll axe him.

On Daniels, he would represent a $1.9 million savings if we cut him. But I can't see them cutting both Daniels and Wynn. That would leave us really thin at DE.

I can only see one or the other being gone at most, and quite honestly I think both will be back.

Wynn and Daniels could save us some nice cash. Guess it all depends on what happens in free agency/draft. I doubt they'll cut both of them but I think it's a strong possibility at least one of them will get the axe.

Schneed10 · 01-04-2007, 05:27 PM

Washington and Griffin are like Springs, cutting them would not represent any cap savings. They'll restructure them both.

MTK · 01-04-2007, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Washington and Griffin are like Springs, cutting them would not represent any cap savings. They'll restructure them both.

The message here is when in doubt just look at the cap, it usually tells the whole story. Thanks for the breakdowns.

Schneed10 · 01-04-2007, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

The message here is when in doubt just look at the cap, it usually tells the whole story. Thanks for the breakdowns.

No problem. As in any business, money makes the world go round.

hesscl34 · 01-05-2007, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NFLNetwork

I know Wynn and Daniels will prob get the boot, but what about some big names. Particulary Washington, Griffin, Springs. AA is prob gone..so exempt him.

NO way Wynn and Daniles are getting the boot. They are core. AA is out of here. You don't bad mouth the coaches in Washington and live until another season.

ArtMonkDrillz · 01-05-2007, 12:50 PM

If Wynn gets cut who will co-host Monday Nite Live?

01-04-2007, 04:57 PM	#1
NFLNetwork No new threads for you Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 122	What Big Name On Defense Is Most Likely To Be Gone??? I know Wynn and Daniels will prob get the boot, but what about some big names. Particulary Washington, Griffin, Springs. AA is prob gone..so exempt him.

01-04-2007, 05:12 PM	#5
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: What Big Name On Defense Is Most Likely To Be Gone??? Yeah, I'm leaning towards Springs leaving myself. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

01-04-2007, 05:19 PM	#6
jbcjr14 The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Austin, Texas Age: 54 Posts: 2,015	Re: What Big Name On Defense Is Most Likely To Be Gone??? Of that group I would say Springs. But I don't think he leaves unless he is unwilling to restructure his deal. You have to keep the heart of your defense (Griff and Washington). It's the Redskins FO, who the hell really knows what they are thinking! __________________ "Work Harder: millions on welfare are counting on you" - Obama 2009 address to Congress.

01-04-2007, 05:20 PM	#7
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,518	Re: What Big Name On Defense Is Most Likely To Be Gone??? Wynn and Daniels both have to be on the hotseat due to their age and contracts. I think Springs will be back with a restructured deal. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

01-04-2007, 05:23 PM	#8
Schneed10 A Dude Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 45 Posts: 12,421	Re: What Big Name On Defense Is Most Likely To Be Gone??? The only way Springs leaves is if he's the deepthroat and GW finds out. __________________ God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.

01-04-2007, 05:26 PM	#9
Schneed10 A Dude Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 45 Posts: 12,421	Re: What Big Name On Defense Is Most Likely To Be Gone??? Wynn would represent a savings of $2.5 million if we cut him. They will certainly try to force him to accept a paycut, and they'll have leverage because he's not worth what his current contract says he is. If he doesn't accept the paycut, they'll axe him. On Daniels, he would represent a $1.9 million savings if we cut him. But I can't see them cutting both Daniels and Wynn. That would leave us really thin at DE. I can only see one or the other being gone at most, and quite honestly I think both will be back. __________________ God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.

01-04-2007, 05:27 PM	#11
Schneed10 A Dude Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 45 Posts: 12,421	Re: What Big Name On Defense Is Most Likely To Be Gone??? Washington and Griffin are like Springs, cutting them would not represent any cap savings. They'll restructure them both. __________________ God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.

01-05-2007, 12:50 PM	#15
ArtMonkDrillz Franchise Player Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Ellicott City, MD Age: 42 Posts: 8,029	Re: What Big Name On Defense Is Most Likely To Be Gone??? If Wynn gets cut who will co-host Monday Nite Live? __________________ "Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude

What Big Name On Defense Is Most Likely To Be Gone???

Locker Room Main Forum