Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Al Saunders

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-08-2007, 10:32 AM   #1
Sean"Big Hurt"Taylor
Special Teams
 
Sean"Big Hurt"Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Queens Village, NY
Age: 44
Posts: 349
Al Saunders

When we made this move to sign him to be the offensive playcalling I thought we were going to win the super bowl. It was wishful thinking. I mean his offense and Williams' defense a match made in heaven. I thought about it and came to the realization that Lord Gibbs is the coach and is a offensive minded coach who would step in and not let Saunders be Saunders. I mean we go out and get Lloyd, Randel El, anc Collins to run the system that was a KC for years and we go back to Redskins football. I really am furious at How Gibbs would sit back and let Saunders do what we are paying him for. His system does work we have witness some of the greatest offense in football for several years than all of sudden it does not work here. Gibbs need to do the same thing with Saunders as he did for Williams and let him picked the personnel and call his plays because we know it works. Sorry folks but as long as Gibbs the coach we will not win a super bowl in this era. This is a passing league not a run, run and pass league. I really appreciate all Gibbs has done for this organization but it is time for a knew era. I will wait and see what happens but Gibbs offense will not get a super bowl this era since know the game has got a lot faster and bigger and stronger than the in the early 90s. We need someone who has been coaching offense that last several years and knows how the league is now and has kept up with the speed of the game. I just would like to know what you guys think. I mean look at the numbers that Saunders has sustained in Kansas City as well as in St. Louis(with the help of Vermil and Martz). Even look at his offensive numbers when he was the head caoch at San Diego some time years ago he even was scoring then.
Sean"Big Hurt"Taylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 10:33 AM   #2
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,568
Re: Al Saunders

What do people have against paragraphs?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2007, 08:03 PM   #3
Skinsfanmania
Special Teams
 
Skinsfanmania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 122
Re: Al Saunders

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
What do people have against paragraphs?
They were originated in the outskirts of Dallas, Tx in a city called Irving.
Skinsfanmania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 10:38 AM   #4
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Al Saunders

I didn't understand that post. I don't understand this thread. Somebody help
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 10:39 AM   #5
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,568
Re: Al Saunders

At least you read it, or tried to. No paragraphs to me = no read.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 10:42 AM   #6
Redskins_P
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
Re: Al Saunders

Are you supporting Al Saunders or bashing him? I don't understand.
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 10:42 AM   #7
ArtMonkDrillz
Franchise Player
 
ArtMonkDrillz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
Re: Al Saunders

If you cross your eyes a little bit you can see an image of the Redskin's logo. It's like one of those magic eye things.
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude
ArtMonkDrillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 10:43 AM   #8
Redskins_P
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
Re: Al Saunders

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtMonkDrillz View Post
If you cross your eyes a little bit you can see an image of the Redskin's logo. It's like one of those magic eye things.
LOL
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 11:04 AM   #9
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,426
Re: Al Saunders

It took me a lot of time, but I think I understand what he's saying. He said we went and got Al Saunders, but then Gibbs didn't let Al do what Al does. He then basically said Gibbs sucks as a coach. And then he said he likes sex with red-ass baboons.

OK I made that last part up. But what he actually said was equally ridiculous.

Did we or did we not improve on offense once Gibbs asserted himself and demanded a return to power running? If anything, the offense is the unit headed into 2007 with the momentum. The Gibbs/Saunders relationship is not the biggest concern for us. The biggest problem is Gregg Williams' D. Has his ego and arrogance caused him to lose the locker room? Has he underestimated his need for talent? Those are our big offseason problems.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 11:09 AM   #10
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
Re: Al Saunders

I can't see the Redskins Logo - all I see is the profile of an indian.

And there is no Easter Bunny.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 11:44 AM   #11
gabe1984
Special Teams
 
gabe1984's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 372
Re: Al Saunders

I strongly disagree with your last post. Our offense was playing horrible until Gibbs stepped in and they started running the ball more, how could you not notice that? Plus, in Al's last two offenses he's had studs at QB, he was running his offense with Brunell, that's probably part of the reason why it didn't work as well, and then he moved to a first year guy in Campbell. And, I don't think you can throw a young guy like JC into such a complex offense, I believe that it was extremely important that they ran the ball more than Saunders normally would to take the pressure off the shoulders of Campbell. We don't need to get his confidence destroyed in a season that was already lost anyway.

I see a monkey beating Tony Romo with a bannana, weird.
gabe1984 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 12:24 PM   #12
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,319
Re: Al Saunders

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean"Big Hurt"Taylor View Post
When we made this move to sign him to be the offensive playcalling I thought we were going to win the super bowl. It was wishful thinking. I mean his offense and Williams' defense a match made in heaven. I thought about it and came to the realization that Lord Gibbs is the coach and is a offensive minded coach who would step in and not let Saunders be Saunders. I mean we go out and get Lloyd, Randel El, anc Collins to run the system that was a KC for years and we go back to Redskins football. I really am furious at How Gibbs would sit back and let Saunders do what we are paying him for. His system does work we have witness some of the greatest offense in football for several years than all of sudden it does not work here. Gibbs need to do the same thing with Saunders as he did for Williams and let him picked the personnel and call his plays because we know it works. Sorry folks but as long as Gibbs the coach we will not win a super bowl in this era. This is a passing league not a run, run and pass league. I really appreciate all Gibbs has done for this organization but it is time for a knew era. I will wait and see what happens but Gibbs offense will not get a super bowl this era since know the game has got a lot faster and bigger and stronger than the in the early 90s. We need someone who has been coaching offense that last several years and knows how the league is now and has kept up with the speed of the game. I just would like to know what you guys think. I mean look at the numbers that Saunders has sustained in Kansas City as well as in St. Louis(with the help of Vermil and Martz). Even look at his offensive numbers when he was the head caoch at San Diego some time years ago he even was scoring then.
Here is the main problem w/ Gibbs and Saunders. Saunders likes to get 5 guys out in the pass patterns. Gibbs likes to send out 3 and keep everyone else in to pass protect. Gibbs is going to have to give in if this offense is ever going to reach it's full potential. In the NFL you have to pass to score and run to win. And right now our passing game isn't good enough to win on a consistent basis. Can anyone tell me when was the last time we threw for 300 yards?
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 01:24 PM   #13
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,426
Re: Al Saunders

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
Here is the main problem w/ Gibbs and Saunders. Saunders likes to get 5 guys out in the pass patterns. Gibbs likes to send out 3 and keep everyone else in to pass protect. Gibbs is going to have to give in if this offense is ever going to reach it's full potential. In the NFL you have to pass to score and run to win. And right now our passing game isn't good enough to win on a consistent basis. Can anyone tell me when was the last time we threw for 300 yards?
But does it make any sense to send 5 guys out in pass routes when you have a young QB just learning how to make reads? I mean isn't that exactly what Spurrier did to Ramsey?

When a QB is older and wiser, and has been in the offense for a while, like Trent Green, then you can send 5 guys out and the QB can probably make the reads and decisions fast enough to beat the pass rush. But a young QB like Campbell is slower to read and react, and needs more time than that. He'll end up holding onto the ball too long and taking mad sacks, or he'll end up making bad decisions and getting picked.

I strongly favor Gibbs' approach for the sake of a young QB's development. Max protect is your friend. Win the game on the ground, and take your shots through the air without sacrificing protection.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 03:15 PM   #14
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,233
Re: Al Saunders

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
But does it make any sense to send 5 guys out in pass routes when you have a young QB just learning how to make reads? I mean isn't that exactly what Spurrier did to Ramsey?

When a QB is older and wiser, and has been in the offense for a while, like Trent Green, then you can send 5 guys out and the QB can probably make the reads and decisions fast enough to beat the pass rush. But a young QB like Campbell is slower to read and react, and needs more time than that. He'll end up holding onto the ball too long and taking mad sacks, or he'll end up making bad decisions and getting picked.

I strongly favor Gibbs' approach for the sake of a young QB's development. Max protect is your friend. Win the game on the ground, and take your shots through the air without sacrificing protection.
That's how I feel it should be all next year as well. As I've mentioned before, run, run, run and let Saunders throw in some of his innovativeness along the way.

We see now the benefits of having a strong-armed QB and the running game is only going to benefit next year. With those kind of options, why even try end-arounds, five-wide sets when you can get by just running the ball and throwing it when you have to. Sometimes, it's just overkill.

I firmly believe that if the defense can at least get back into average mode, we'll be a playoff team again. We need a top ten defense for a Super Bowl run.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 04:36 PM   #15
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,319
Re: Al Saunders

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
But does it make any sense to send 5 guys out in pass routes when you have a young QB just learning how to make reads? I mean isn't that exactly what Spurrier did to Ramsey?

When a QB is older and wiser, and has been in the offense for a while, like Trent Green, then you can send 5 guys out and the QB can probably make the reads and decisions fast enough to beat the pass rush. But a young QB like Campbell is slower to read and react, and needs more time than that. He'll end up holding onto the ball too long and taking mad sacks, or he'll end up making bad decisions and getting picked.

I strongly favor Gibbs' approach for the sake of a young QB's development. Max protect is your friend. Win the game on the ground, and take your shots through the air without sacrificing protection.
Gibbs acts like JC is a frickin little baby. He needs to stop coddleling him. Sending 3 guys out on 3rd down is outdated. JC STARTED AT AURBURN FOR 4 YEARS. He can handle it. In certain situations you can send out 5 guys. Like on 1st down? Not all the time but some of the time you have to do it. This is why we don't score enough TD's becasue our offense is too conservative. Or how about running a hurry up offense next year some of the time? I watched Pennington do it and he can't even throw the ball. We need to diversify the offense.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.57184 seconds with 10 queries