|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
03-09-2007, 05:21 PM | #1 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Giants Trade for Droughns
Giants send Tim Carter to Cleveland for Reuben Droughns
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
03-09-2007, 05:23 PM | #2 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Giants Trade for Droughns
Droughns is a very ho-hum, 3 yards and a cloud of dust kind of RB. I'd much rather face him twice a year vs. Tiki.
I'm still surprised they didn't get Rhodes, that would have been a good combo, Rhodes and Jacobs. |
03-09-2007, 05:24 PM | #3 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Giants Trade for Droughns
Something tells me that the Giants aren't done with their running back situation -- even with this signing.
If they are, then I feel a lot better about facing Droughns twice a year rather than McGahee. |
03-09-2007, 05:24 PM | #4 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Giants Trade for Droughns
who cares, he sucks.
|
03-09-2007, 07:31 PM | #5 |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: round the way
Age: 41
Posts: 2,211
|
Re: Giants Trade for Droughns
__________________
SOMEBODY PINCH ME |
03-09-2007, 07:34 PM | #6 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nashville,TN
Age: 51
Posts: 474
|
Re: Giants Trade for Droughns
__________________
BEWARE THE MIDDLE............LaRON LANDRY IS LURKING! |
03-09-2007, 07:35 PM | #7 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nashville,TN
Age: 51
Posts: 474
|
Re: Giants Trade for Droughns
Aren't he and Lamont jordan basically the same back?
__________________
BEWARE THE MIDDLE............LaRON LANDRY IS LURKING! |
03-09-2007, 09:03 PM | #8 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Giants Trade for Droughns
Actually, this is somewhat correct. They both have been solid backs in the past, and both were awful this year. Droughns was even more awful than Jordan was, but this is probably due to a number of luck based factors. They have had very similar career paths.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
03-09-2007, 05:36 PM | #9 |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Giants Trade for Droughns
Droughns is no Tiki but he is a good RB who played on an awful team. He is good for at least 800 yards and if he is the primary RB he'll hit the 1000 mark.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
03-09-2007, 05:39 PM | #10 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Giants Trade for Droughns
On the Denver RB spectrum, Droughns represents the middle ground between dominant backs like Terrell Davis, Portis, or Mike Anderson, and the crappy, replacement level backs like Quentin Griffin, Olandis Gary, and Tatum Bell.
If your team is starting Droughns, you should probably try to improve your situation, but things could be much much worse.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
03-09-2007, 06:39 PM | #11 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
Posts: 936
|
Re: Giants Trade for Droughns
Quote:
__________________
“Don't ask me what I think of you, I might not give the answer that you want me to.” |
|
03-09-2007, 06:46 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Giants Trade for Droughns
|
03-09-2007, 07:10 PM | #13 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Giants Trade for Droughns
Look at the numbers. Denver's running game was way more effective when led by Anderson then when its been led by Gary, or Droughns, or Tatum Bell.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
03-09-2007, 05:48 PM | #14 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Age: 36
Posts: 3,417
|
Re: Giants Trade for Droughns
|
03-09-2007, 07:07 PM | #15 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 54
|
Re: Giants Trade for Droughns
The only thing bad about this is that it means Cleveland is probaly going to take Peterson instead of him slipping to 6 and giving our pick more trade value. If Quinn doesnt slip im not sure the FO is gonna get as much as they would like for the #6 pick.
|
|
|