trade with pats

[rvd420]

we should trade springs and uor 6 pick to the pats for samuel and their 24 pick and their 3 round pick.this trade makes more sense than the briggs trade does,cause we sucked at the db area last year with very few picks.with the 24 pick get brandon meriweather,then trade the 3 round and next years 3 rounder for a 2 round pick this year and take charles johnson.

[SUNRA]

Originally Posted by rvd420

we should trade springs and uor 6 pick to the pats for samuel and their 24 pick and their 3 round pick.this trade makes more sense than the briggs trade does,cause we sucked at the db area last year with very few picks.with the 24 pick get brandon meriweather,then trade the 3 round and next years 3 rounder for a 2 round pick this year and take charles johnson.

Man, you have analyised, synthesized and over empathsized the point of getting Samuels.

[rvd420]

it makes sense though.dont you think.

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by rvd420

it makes sense though.dont you think.

Nope. The guy wants a gazillion dollars.

[theJBexperience]

Aside from the D-Line problems still not being addressed, oh and the huge amount of cap killing dollars that Asante would cost.

I'd make that trade in Madden though.

[#56fanatic]

boy I can't wait unitl the season starts. we have talked about all these trade scenarios way TOO much..

NO TO SAMUEL - makes no sense. Rogers, springs, smoot, Macklin are good corners. No need to bring in another starter. How about adding some quality depth if you want to bring someone else in. If we bring in another starter its going to cause tension. we need to have someone that knows their role. We have 4 starters as it is.

[100% PURE WHOOP ASS]

Originally Posted by #56fanatic

boy I can't wait unitl the season starts. we have talked about all these trade scenarios way TOO much..

NO TO SAMUEL - makes no sense. Rogers, springs, smoot, Macklin are good corners. No need to bring in another starter. How about adding some quality depth if you want to bring someone else in. If we bring in another starter its going to cause tension. we need to have someone that knows their role. We have 4 starters as it is.

no there not, there serviceable corners, Rogers is undercheving (my god we past on Merrieman) Springs is a shell of what he use to be, Smoot was let go cause he sucks in any system.......Macklin was the 3rd or 4th DB in the Cardinals system (need i say more) Samuels would be a breath of fresh air, and and the 24th pick and a 3rd rounder....

[vaoutlaws2006]

Originally Posted by 100% PURE WHOOP ASS

no there not, there serviceable corners, Rogers is undercheving (my god we past on Merrieman) Springs is a shell of what he use to be, Smoot was let go cause he sucks in any system.......Macklin was the 3rd or 4th DB in the Cardinals system (need i say more) Samuels would be a breath of fresh air, and and the 24th pick and a 3rd rounder....

you must have fallen and hit you head if you think asante samuel is a good fit here with the defensive system gw runs...sure samuel is an interception machine but he isnt big enough nor physical enough to play corner in a greg williams defense.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by vaoutlaws2006

you must have fallen and hit you head if you think asante samuel is a good fit here with the defensive system gw runs...sure samuel is an interception machine but he isnt big enough nor physical enough to play corner in a greg williams defense.

Not true.

Samuel might be an overrated player because of his liability against the run, assuming he does in fact present a liability against the run. He will be no worse off here than he was in NE though, so if you thought he was a good player in NE, then you also think he will be a good player here.

Grilliams likes bigger corners, as he darn well should, because they tend to be undervalued. But that shouldn't take away from the fact that Samuel is an outstanding player that any team would be lucky to have.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by #56fanatic

boy I can't wait unitl the season starts. we have talked about all these trade scenarios way TOO much..

NO TO SAMUEL - makes no sense. Rogers, springs, smoot, Macklin are good corners. No need to bring in another starter. How about adding some quality depth if you want to bring someone else in. If we bring in another starter its going to cause tension. we need to have someone that knows their role. We have 4 starters as it is.

But yeah, passing on a shot to take Amobi Okoye for Asante Samuel makes little sense.

[Longtimefan]

Originally Posted by #56fanatic

boy I can't wait unitl the season starts. we have talked about all these trade scenarios way TOO much..

NO TO SAMUEL - makes no sense. Rogers, springs, smoot, Macklin are good corners. No need to bring in another starter. How about adding some quality depth if you want to bring someone else in. If we bring in another starter its going to cause tension. we need to have someone that knows their role. We have 4 starters as it is.

I agree with you 56. I would think we're going to go with what we have at the CB position despite the fact we could stand to upgrade. I don't think it likely we will trade any existing players, and Springs will be a Redskin despite his contract. Samuel will cost more than Springs.

[4mrusmc]

You guys kill me when you talk about Madden. What a thread-kill.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

really enough already no more trade talk havent seen it on tv just keep the damn 6th pick take gaines adams if he is gone take landry and use the last 4 picks we have in day to on d lineman we could find a mark anderson or marques colston and sign ian scott

[holcknowsbest]

amen quake, but instead of adams i would take anderson, if hes gone go landry

[skinsfan_nn]

oh no