|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
05-02-2007, 09:54 AM | #1 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 372
|
Santana vs. Randy
There was a little debate going on about this in the Brady's Bedtime Buddies thread. I just want to bring this out in the open for everyone to discuss. Right now, which Moss would you rather have on the team, Santanna or Randy. I'm sayin Santanna.
1) Randy Moss is getting old, while Santanna is in the prime of his career. 2) Randy Moss is afraid to get hit, while Santanna constantly goes over the middle and takes shots. I have seen Randy Moss stop running routes before because he knew he was going to get hit. If you doubt me, watch the 2001 NFC Championship game when the Giants spanked Minnesota. He wouldn't even sacrifice his body in a big game. 3) Randy takes plays off, Sanatanna goes hard the entire game. 4) Randy has a huge ego and an attitude problem while Santanna just wants to win. 5) Randy does not have the YAC ability that Santanna has. While Randy may be a better deep ball threat, Santanna is no slouch there either. Brunell to Moss, TD! Brunell to Moss, TD! Does anyone remember that game? While in the prime of his career Randy may have be better than Santanna, there is no way I'd rather have him on the Skins than Santanna right now.
__________________
In the Land of the Blind the man with one eye is king, but today in the Land of the Skunks, THE MAN WITH HALF A NOSE IS KING!!!!! |
05-02-2007, 10:01 AM | #2 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Santanna vs. Randy
There's only one receiver in the entire NFL that I would take over S. Moss; Steve Smith. And even then I feel like I'm splitting hairs.
|
05-02-2007, 01:13 PM | #3 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Santanna vs. Randy
Quote:
Run after the catch ability is so vital to the value of any given receiver. If I had to guess, I would say that 2/3's of a guys value is determined by his ability to make plays after the catch. No one is better in this respect than Smith and Moss. Not even Randy Moss.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
10-18-2007, 05:12 PM | #4 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 50
Posts: 1,801
|
Re: Santanna vs. Randy
Quote:
splitting hairs?? Steve Smith, as much as i dislike the guy, is one of if not the biggest playmaking WR in the NFL. Can you seriously say that about Santana right now? He has 1 good year here. The other two have been very iffy. |
|
10-19-2007, 01:29 PM | #5 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Santanna vs. Randy
At the time I wrote that post, yes, we were splitting hairs. But again, that's just the I see it.
|
05-02-2007, 10:08 AM | #6 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Santana vs. Randy
I think Randy Moss is the overall better player than Santana, I think we'll see what Randy has left in NE. If it's truly gone or just part of being part of an anemic offense. I like Santana, last year he proved a lot to me, but I still think he's at the bottom 10 or maybe even 15 receivers in the NFL.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
05-02-2007, 10:10 AM | #7 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Santana vs. Randy
Quote:
|
|
05-02-2007, 10:26 AM | #8 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 372
|
Re: Santana vs. Randy
Quote:
__________________
In the Land of the Blind the man with one eye is king, but today in the Land of the Skunks, THE MAN WITH HALF A NOSE IS KING!!!!! |
|
05-02-2007, 10:41 AM | #9 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Santana vs. Randy
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
05-02-2007, 10:46 AM | #10 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
|
Re: Santana vs. Randy
Quote:
Off the Top of My Head and In no particular order, the top 15 receivers (give or take a few) in the league. So you are telling me Moss is at the bottom of that? Who would you take over him (not counting age)? Smith, Holt, C. Johnson, Harrison, Fitzgerald, maybe Andre Johnson (who would be a real stud on a better team). So that still puts you at #7 on a bad day, but I guess you could make the argument for #9 or 10 . . . certainly not out of the top ten though. Steve Smith Chad Johnson Marvin Harrison Reggie Wayne T.O. Donald Driver Torry Holt Randy Moss Laverneous Coles Hines Ward Andre Johnson Javon Walker Fitzgerald Boldin Santana Moss
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. |
|
05-02-2007, 11:07 AM | #11 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 372
|
Re: Santana vs. Randy
Quote:
Scroll down here to his 10th response involving his 40 time. EXTREMESKINS.com - Oct 13: Santana Moss Look at the bottom where it says trade to patriots. Randy Moss - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Looks to me they're about the same, Santanna may have the edge.
__________________
In the Land of the Blind the man with one eye is king, but today in the Land of the Skunks, THE MAN WITH HALF A NOSE IS KING!!!!! |
|
05-03-2007, 02:04 PM | #12 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 478
|
Re: Santana vs. Randy
Quote:
receptions: Santana (290); Andre (310) comparable yards: Santana (4689); Andre (3953) Santana has 700 more TD's: Santana (34); Andre (17) Santana has DOUBLE Donald driver has played many more seasons so his career is further along than santana. But his numbers arent that impressive considering his tenure
__________________
McNasty FTW! |
|
05-02-2007, 01:03 PM | #13 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Age: 36
Posts: 3,441
|
Re: Santana vs. Randy
Quote:
|
|
05-02-2007, 03:12 PM | #14 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 726
|
Re: Santana vs. Randy
Randy is still a stud, he had no team around him, no QB, and no hope.
Santana is also a stud, with a young QB and new system. both are good, i'd rather have santana...but the person who wrote that he'd rather have santana over every reciever save Steve Smith is simply pushing more blind redskins drivel. Please, harrison (old or not), holt, chad johnson, hines ward, anquan boldin, roy williams, these are all guys you've have to consider, with most, i'd argue being better.
__________________
in writing these daily letters and trying to make them interesting it is always possible that some sentiment may occur which has not received the severe and deliberate scrutiny and reconsideration which should attach to a State Paper. - Churchill |
05-02-2007, 03:40 PM | #15 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Santana vs. Randy
Quote:
Can you honestly think of, in the past three years, one, just one, wideout who has singled handedly shut the door on opposing teams at the end of the game like Moss has? I can't. There are some that are probably more physical, some faster, but none can adjust to the ball mid air and turn nothing into something like Santana Moss. And I'd strongly argue your points about Chad, Marvin, Boldin..(They all have either a Pro Bowl QB or a Pro Bowler opposite them.) Hines Ward? You're kidding, right? Roy Williams, nope. Not a game breaker like Moss. Holt...again, look at the supporting cast there. Either he had a prolific passer or a stud opposite him. And that leaves me with Mr. Smith. I'll say they both have comparable supporting casts, yet Smith, pound for pound, is slightly better than Moss. |
|
|
|