![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
|
They're back...
A good year is in store for the defense. For those who said that Lemar should be starting and that Rocky is a bust and that Taylor has lost it. Well, I hate to tell you that I told you so, but I told you so.
Hail to the Redskins and the second g is for genius! I hope to God that Washington is o.k. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: They're back...
Additionally, Springs looks fully healthy and that's huge for us.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: They're back...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: They're back...
...it's still the preseason.
Not that there was any reason to think that the coaching staff was wrong on McIntosh in the first place... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brazil, IN
Age: 55
Posts: 883
|
Re: They're back...
At least we are not getting blown out like last year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 37
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: They're back...
It looked like Taylor's weight loss is messing with his hitting ability, Taylor came up to lay what looked to have been a nasty hit on Steelers RB Verron Haynes, but Taylor bounced right off of him. Overall though the defense lookes nasty, Rocky, Carlos, Landry, Springs all looked extremely impressive. Negatives on the defense were Sean Taylor who missed a tackle on Haynes, and had a bad play in coverage, Fred Smoot also didn't look very impressive for the second week in a row.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: They're back...
Quote:
You really picked that play out as a defensive negative? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: They're back...
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Age: 56
Posts: 2,015
|
Re: They're back...
If I recall he missed a tackle on the long Santonio Holmes play. They left him out on an island and if he makes that tackle the drive is over and the Steelers would have had to punt. Other than that, I don't think he played bad at all.
__________________
"Work Harder: millions on welfare are counting on you" - Obama 2009 address to Congress. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 579
|
Re: They're back...
That was a pretty bad missed tackle. It was like a bull running by a matador's red cape. Ole!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 2 Minutes away from Fedex Field, Maryland
Posts: 363
|
Re: They're back...
lets get some interceptions now
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 37
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: They're back...
Absolutely I pick that play as a defensive negative. Instead of going for the huge hit, which he missed, Taylor should have arm tackled Haynes the right way. Plus I never said Taylor wasn't going to be a huge hitter anymore, I don't doubt that for a second, I am just thinking that if he would have had those 20 extra pounds he could've got Haynes down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: They're back...
Quote:
I also saw excellent play by the first, second, and third stringers in goal line situations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 37
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: They're back...
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: They're back...
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|