Adam Archuleta to Start

T.O.Killa · 08-19-2007, 07:32 PM

It looks like he started for them, does anyone know how he did?KFFL - Adam Archuleta, SS, Chicago Bears

saden1 · 08-19-2007, 07:49 PM

You know, I wouldn't be surprised if he plays well in their system. You never know, he might become the corner stone of their defense

I'm just be glad we off loaded his dead weight onto someone else

hooskins · 08-20-2007, 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saden1

You know, I wouldn't be surprised if he plays well in their system. You never know, he might become the corner stone of their defense

I'm just be glad we off loaded his dead weight onto someone else

It's gonna be fun December 6th, to see how he does against us. I hope GW suggests a couple nice plays to Al that burned AA in the past.

mlmpetert · 08-20-2007, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hooskins

It's gonna be fun December 6th, to see how he does against us. I hope GW suggests a couple nice plays to Al that burned AA in the past.

I cant wait

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 08-19-2007, 08:26 PM

same system he had in St. Louis. He should thrive in it.

dmek25 · 08-19-2007, 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

same system he had in St. Louis. He should thrive in it.

i wonder why people think this? did he ever make a pro bowl? i think the skins took a chance on him because of what he could have been, not what he was.

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 08-19-2007, 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dmek25

i wonder why people think this? did he ever make a pro bowl? i think the skins took a chance on him because of what he could have been, not what he was.

I dont think so but he was a solid player at times in St. Louis.

jsarno · 08-20-2007, 01:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

I dont think so but he was a solid player at times in St. Louis.

No, he wasn't.
He was an excellent player for St. Louis. Problem is, it's hard to find a compliment for ST's me first play. Arch didn't fit well here...no hard feelings, I wish him success in Chicago.

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 08-20-2007, 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jsarno

No, he wasn't.
He was an excellent player for St. Louis. Problem is, it's hard to find a compliment for ST's me first play. Arch didn't fit well here...no hard feelings, I wish him success in Chicago.

That is what I said a solid player for St. Louis.

dmek25 · 08-20-2007, 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jsarno

No, he wasn't.
He was an excellent player for St. Louis. Problem is, it's hard to find a compliment for ST's me first play. Arch didn't fit well here...no hard feelings, I wish him success in Chicago.

i disagree with this. i saw a bunch of rams games( because my brothers a fan) and archuleta was the same kind of player there. pretty good up in the box, but couldnt cover me. im not sure what the skins saw in him that made them think he would fit here

Waleo · 08-20-2007, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dmek25

i wonder why people think this? did he ever make a pro bowl? i think the skins took a chance on him because of what he could have been, not what he was.

Yeah he did in St.Louis. Archuleta was one of the best safeties while in STL. That's why it was a big deal. He killed under Lovie in St.Louis and he will do it in Chicago. Archuleta is a beast when used right.

artmonkforhallofamein07 · 08-19-2007, 08:28 PM

Who Cares?

skinsfan_nn · 08-19-2007, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by artmonkforhallofamein07

Who Cares?

Agreed, could care less about that shit bird!

I am however looking foward to him coming back into DC on 12.6 with his no good teammates and getting there ass kicked!

Daseal · 08-19-2007, 09:32 PM

Exactly, he'll do fine in a cover 2 type of defense. Greg Williams needs a bit more out of his safeties.

wilsowilso · 08-19-2007, 10:01 PM

Arch lost a considerable amount of speed in a Redskin uniform(as in he went from fast to slow) leading me to speculate that he was on the juice in his St Louis career, but after he got paid he stopped risking getting caught. If he plays well this year then my theory is garbage, but if he looks slow and washed up then I say he was simply a chemicaly enhanced player that fooled people long enough to get a sick signing bonus. I'm talking HGH by the way or something that up until now was basically undetectable.

08-19-2007, 07:32 PM	#1
T.O.Killa The Starter Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Berlin, MD Posts: 2,061	Adam Archuleta to Start It looks like he started for them, does anyone know how he did?KFFL - Adam Archuleta, SS, Chicago Bears

08-19-2007, 07:49 PM	#2
saden1 MVP Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 45 Posts: 10,069	Re: Adam Archuleta to Start You know, I wouldn't be surprised if he plays well in their system. You never know, he might become the corner stone of their defense I'm just be glad we off loaded his dead weight onto someone else __________________ "The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins

08-19-2007, 08:26 PM	#5
EARTHQUAKE2689 You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 35 Posts: 14,167	Re: Adam Archuleta to Start same system he had in St. Louis. He should thrive in it. __________________ https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.

08-19-2007, 08:28 PM	#12
artmonkforhallofamein07 Pro Bowl Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Charleston , SC Posts: 5,001	Re: Adam Archuleta to Start Who Cares? __________________ Just win.

08-19-2007, 09:32 PM	#14
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 41 Posts: 8,341	Re: Adam Archuleta to Start Exactly, he'll do fine in a cover 2 type of defense. Greg Williams needs a bit more out of his safeties. __________________ Best. Player. Available.

08-19-2007, 10:01 PM	#15
wilsowilso Registered User Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Los Angeles Age: 51 Posts: 2,841	Re: Adam Archuleta to Start Arch lost a considerable amount of speed in a Redskin uniform(as in he went from fast to slow) leading me to speculate that he was on the juice in his St Louis career, but after he got paid he stopped risking getting caught. If he plays well this year then my theory is garbage, but if he looks slow and washed up then I say he was simply a chemicaly enhanced player that fooled people long enough to get a sick signing bonus. I'm talking HGH by the way or something that up until now was basically undetectable.

Adam Archuleta to Start

Locker Room Main Forum