Is todd wade really gonna start at LG?

sandman89 · 08-21-2007, 04:11 PM

K i hear now that he might take some time to adjust at the LG position.And guys like Pucalo and others are competing.So who do you think will start? I say and you guys might not agree ,but i say we should start Heyer at LG.Look hes young very big and he has alot off help from guys like Thomas and Samuels .Give the guy a try there i think he'll fit more better there than LT cause i think he can't handle the LT position to well yet.We put him at LG he'll be real big and guys won't go trough at all I believe and in the rushing he can help Portis out too.But i think he can't be good at LT and i think Bugle might even switch him when Samuels comes back.But hey Todd Wade let some guys trough and they said he was doing great at that position so what do you guys say you agree with me I really Like Heyer.

TheMalcolmConnection · 08-21-2007, 04:16 PM

The only problem with that is the fact that you can find quite a few linemen in the league who are young and big.

It's finding the good ones that's hard.

wilsowilso · 08-21-2007, 04:17 PM

Heyer is much less of an NFL guard than he is an nfl tackle. I think he played tackle all four years in college. He doesn't have the body type suited for guard. Neither does Wade for that matter but only because he is too tall.

TheMalcolmConnection · 08-21-2007, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wilsowilso

Heyer is much less of an NFL guard than he is an nfl tackle. I think he played tackle all four years in college. He doesn't have the body type suited for guard. Neither does Wade for that matter but only because he is too tall.

A lot of people quote sizes but I think that's just something the media puts out. Randy Thomas is one inch shorter and 5 pounds lighter, but no one is saying he's playing out of place.

SmootSmack · 08-21-2007, 04:26 PM

You really have to start writing more legibly. It's not a bad thread, it's a good one in fact, but it's hard to care what you have say when you write so incoherently.

firstdown · 08-21-2007, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

You really have to start writing more legibly. It's not a bad thread, it's a good one in fact, but it's hard to care what you have say when you write so incoherently.

He has to type fast so he can move on to the next thread he is thinking about starting. LOL

sandman89 · 08-21-2007, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by firstdown

He has to type fast so he can move on to the next thread he is thinking about starting. LOL

Actually i get lazy and the CPU is acting slow ,so each time i type it takes a 1min .

FRPLG · 08-21-2007, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sandman89

Actually i get lazy and the CPU is acting slow ,so each time i type it takes a 1min .

Boo hoo. Take the freaking time to put some grammar effort into your posts please. Some of them are rather illegible.

sandman89 · 08-21-2007, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRPLG

Boo hoo. Take the freaking time to put some grammar effort into your posts please. Some of them are rather illegible.

Your funny,Can you read this now cause its enough to tell you I don't care.

Oakland Red · 08-21-2007, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRPLG

Boo hoo. Take the freaking time to put some grammar effort into your posts please. Some of them are rather illegible.

I'd worry more about acting like a civil person if I were you. Also, your grammar isn't very good either (e.g., "some grammar effort?").

jermus22 · 08-22-2007, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRPLG

Boo hoo. Take the freaking time to put some grammar effort into your posts please. Some of them are rather illegible.

My grammar is more better than you alls grammar.

DGreene28 · 08-21-2007, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

You really have to start writing more legibly. It's not a bad thread, it's a good one in fact, but it's hard to care what you have say when you write so incoherently.

Tough crowd SS

skinsfan_nn · 08-21-2007, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

You really have to start writing more legibly. It's not a bad thread, it's a good one in fact, but it's hard to care what you have say when you write so incoherently.

I'll second that thought! Grammar 101 in session.......

Longtimefan · 08-21-2007, 04:55 PM

The origional idea was to have Wade start next to Samuels, but the two have not been able to team because Samuels went down. There is nothing to make me think that is not still the plan. I know coaches were hoping for the two to have a little more time to work together, but injury thwarted that plan.

MTK · 08-21-2007, 06:10 PM

No offense to the thread starter here, but I'm going crazy talking about who's going to play LG. All I'm going to say is, someone will play LG this year, and that someone will do a good enough job to get by. If we can just get decent play out of the position we'll be fine.

08-21-2007, 04:11 PM	#1
sandman89 Special Teams Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 137	Is todd wade really gonna start at LG? K i hear now that he might take some time to adjust at the LG position.And guys like Pucalo and others are competing.So who do you think will start? I say and you guys might not agree ,but i say we should start Heyer at LG.Look hes young very big and he has alot off help from guys like Thomas and Samuels .Give the guy a try there i think he'll fit more better there than LT cause i think he can't handle the LT position to well yet.We put him at LG he'll be real big and guys won't go trough at all I believe and in the rushing he can help Portis out too.But i think he can't be good at LT and i think Bugle might even switch him when Samuels comes back.But hey Todd Wade let some guys trough and they said he was doing great at that position so what do you guys say you agree with me I really Like Heyer. __________________ http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/a...ton02GFX/s.png

08-21-2007, 04:16 PM	#2
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: Is todd wade really gonna start at LG? The only problem with that is the fact that you can find quite a few linemen in the league who are young and big. It's finding the good ones that's hard. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

08-21-2007, 04:17 PM	#3
wilsowilso Registered User Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Los Angeles Age: 51 Posts: 2,841	Re: Is todd wade really gonna start at LG? Heyer is much less of an NFL guard than he is an nfl tackle. I think he played tackle all four years in college. He doesn't have the body type suited for guard. Neither does Wade for that matter but only because he is too tall.

08-21-2007, 04:26 PM	#5
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: Is todd wade really gonna start at LG? You really have to start writing more legibly. It's not a bad thread, it's a good one in fact, but it's hard to care what you have say when you write so incoherently. __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

08-21-2007, 04:55 PM	#14
Longtimefan Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Germantown, Md. Posts: 4,832	Re: Is todd wade really gonna start at LG? The origional idea was to have Wade start next to Samuels, but the two have not been able to team because Samuels went down. There is nothing to make me think that is not still the plan. I know coaches were hoping for the two to have a little more time to work together, but injury thwarted that plan. __________________ A revolution is coming and it will be televised.

08-21-2007, 06:10 PM	#15
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,518	Re: Is todd wade really gonna start at LG? No offense to the thread starter here, but I'm going crazy talking about who's going to play LG. All I'm going to say is, someone will play LG this year, and that someone will do a good enough job to get by. If we can just get decent play out of the position we'll be fine. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

Is todd wade really gonna start at LG?

Locker Room Main Forum