Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Clinton Portis

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-24-2007, 10:04 AM   #1
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Clinton Portis

while I'm not happy with the loss, this really bothers me. why does it seem like Portis is always on the bench in crunch time? i have no problem with calling a run at the end of a game. i do have a problem with our back up carrying it. the one thing Portis has shown here is the ability to get into the end zone. it seemed like for alot of the second half, Portis was on the sideline. the man is too good, and makes too much, to be a spectator
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 10:15 AM   #2
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,565
Re: Clinton Portis

I don't have a big problem with it. Betts has been a very productive runner for us and he has to be able to get it done in big spots just like Portis.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 11:25 AM   #3
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,620
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
I don't have a big problem with it. Betts has been a very productive runner for us and he has to be able to get it done in big spots just like Portis.
WRONG. You put your best players in when the game is on the line, period. The fact that Betts has been a productive runner for us in the past doesn't factor into this equation. It's nice to have a productive backup, but he shouldn't be in there in that situation. To have Portis on the sideline as much as he was is ridiculous.
Chief X_Phackter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 10:23 AM   #4
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
Re: Clinton Portis

He WAS hurt in the 2nd qtr, knee or leg it looked like, but he did come back in the second half.

Maybe it was his drops and fumbles.

Betts is a good shot to score too, it's not like we had a scrub trying to push into the end zone. I would've liked to see Sellers with a run on that last goal-line push, but if Betts HAD scored, you'd all be praising him and asking for him to start over Portis.

We can't go back in time. Gibbs has taken us to 4 Super Bowls and at the time, he trusted his players to execute. They didn't.
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 10:23 AM   #5
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,867
Re: Clinton Portis

Regardless of who was running the ball at the end of the game it would have not mattered the line fall apart on the last two plays.
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 10:35 AM   #6
Southpaw
The Starter
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 46
Posts: 1,319
Re: Clinton Portis

Gibbs stated Betts was in because he was in on the entire last drive, so it just made sense to leave him in to finish the drive. The problem is, Portis has a nose for the endzone and Betts seems like he's effing scared of scoring touchdowns. Gibbs also stated that those last two runs are their best running play. The second issue is, those are Portis' best runs. Betts is most effective running inside, so I don't understand the call to run Betts wide.

The supposed "power back" got stoned by Antonio Pierce(who didn't even wrap him up initially) on third down, and then TRIPPED on fourth and the game. That was frustrating as hell to watch. Of course the game shouldn't have come down to that, but watching Campbell lead them down to the one yard line, and then Betts falling down with the game on the line pissed me off.
Southpaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 12:08 PM   #7
Takeuon
Impact Rookie
 
Takeuon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 573
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southpaw View Post
Gibbs stated Betts was in because he was in on the entire last drive, so it just made sense to leave him in to finish the drive. The problem is, Portis has a nose for the endzone and Betts seems like he's effing scared of scoring touchdowns. Gibbs also stated that those last two runs are their best running play. The second issue is, those are Portis' best runs. Betts is most effective running inside, so I don't understand the call to run Betts wide.

The supposed "power back" got stoned by Antonio Pierce(who didn't even wrap him up initially) on third down, and then TRIPPED on fourth and the game. That was frustrating as hell to watch. Of course the game shouldn't have come down to that, but watching Campbell lead them down to the one yard line, and then Betts falling down with the game on the line pissed me off.

Agreed.....was hard to stomach! I'm still picking up my hair I pulled out, off the floor of the bar I watched the game at. Not really sure if Portis would have been any beter then Betts in that situation. Whatever the case....we sure didnt need to rush that play with over 25 secs to go :o( O-line was not prepared.
Takeuon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 12:24 PM   #8
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southpaw View Post
Gibbs stated Betts was in because he was in on the entire last drive, so it just made sense to leave him in to finish the drive. The problem is, Portis has a nose for the endzone and Betts seems like he's effing scared of scoring touchdowns. Gibbs also stated that those last two runs are their best running play. The second issue is, those are Portis' best runs. Betts is most effective running inside, so I don't understand the call to run Betts wide.

The supposed "power back" got stoned by Antonio Pierce(who didn't even wrap him up initially) on third down, and then TRIPPED on fourth and the game. That was frustrating as hell to watch. Of course the game shouldn't have come down to that, but watching Campbell lead them down to the one yard line, and then Betts falling down with the game on the line pissed me off.
Exactly...that's a play where Portis lowers his pads and goes into the endzone standing up! Betts didn't level his pads and didn't seem to make any effort to break the tackle.

As for Portis getting stuffed on 3 dives a few years ago. Betts is the same back who had someone grab his shirt tail and go down on like the 3. His shirt tail and he couldn't break the guy's grip in order to score. People need to see Betts for what he does: good vision, find the hole, hit the hole, go down after one hit (and generally fall backwards)
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 10:38 AM   #9
jbcjr14
The Starter
 
jbcjr14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Age: 54
Posts: 2,015
Re: Clinton Portis

If you really want to break down some things CP's fumble and his dropped pass (easily would have been a 1st down) really hurt this football team yesterday. I don't think he played well at all outside the crushing block on Pierce and a couple good runs. Let us not forget he also got a delay of game for spinning the damn ball after a 10 yard run...idiot!
__________________
"Work Harder: millions on welfare are counting on you" - Obama 2009 address to Congress.
jbcjr14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 11:09 AM   #10
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,565
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbcjr14 View Post
If you really want to break down some things CP's fumble and his dropped pass (easily would have been a 1st down) really hurt this football team yesterday. I don't think he played well at all outside the crushing block on Pierce and a couple good runs. Let us not forget he also got a delay of game for spinning the damn ball after a 10 yard run...idiot!
It was a 5 yard penalty for spiking the ball
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 11:12 AM   #11
Southpaw
The Starter
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 46
Posts: 1,319
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbcjr14 View Post
If you really want to break down some things CP's fumble and his dropped pass (easily would have been a 1st down) really hurt this football team yesterday. I don't think he played well at all outside the crushing block on Pierce and a couple good runs. Let us not forget he also got a delay of game for spinning the damn ball after a 10 yard run...idiot!
What does Portis dropping a pass, or muffing a handoff have to do with Betts being unable to get into the endzone, or tripping over his one lineman with the game on the line? Of course those plays hurt(like several others from several other players), but the point is, Portis finds the endzone, and Betts doesn't.

Betts runs well when there's a hole. If there's no hole for him to run through, he's ineffective. Portis can at least attempt to make something out of nothing, which is a skill the Betts completely lacks.
Southpaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 11:18 AM   #12
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbcjr14 View Post
If you really want to break down some things CP's fumble and his dropped pass (easily would have been a 1st down) really hurt this football team yesterday. I don't think he played well at all outside the crushing block on Pierce and a couple good runs. Let us not forget he also got a delay of game for spinning the damn ball after a 10 yard run...idiot!
that fumble lies more on Campbell then Portis. its his responsibility to make sure the hand-off hits portis in the chest
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 11:29 AM   #13
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,620
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25 View Post
that fumble lies more on Campbell then Portis. its his responsibility to make sure the hand-off hits portis in the chest
Nothing Campbell could do different there. Portis shouldn't have been reaching for the ball. He should have let Campbell put it in the breadbasket. Instead he reached for the ball because he was too anxious to hit the hole and it dropped.
Chief X_Phackter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 09:54 AM   #14
Slingin Sammy 33
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25 View Post
that fumble lies more on Campbell then Portis. its his responsibility to make sure the hand-off hits portis in the chest
There is some responsibility on Campbell, but the majority is on Portis. The ball hit his arm. This is RB 101, you always have your arms opened where you receive the ball. This is practiced everyday and is inexcusable for a $ 5M + per year RB.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 10:41 AM   #15
WillH
The Starter
 
WillH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,592
Re: Clinton Portis

Im sorry, there is NO WAY Betts is even nearly as good as CP at finding the goal line. I agree that it seemed ridiculous to me that he wasn't in there on those last two plays. Obviously there was something coach saw that I didn't, but it still made me wanna tear my hair out.
WillH is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.99225 seconds with 10 queries