![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 51
Posts: 9,534
|
The Official draft Marcus Monk thread.
I might be one of only a few people on this bandwagon, but I think this kid would be PERFECT for us. He'll come cheap due to concerns about his knee, even though he played 6 games to end his senior season. Even better, he's 6'6" and 219lbs and has great speed as well.
I'm not sold on Hackett at all, and he'll cost us 5 mil a year or so while Monk will cost us less than a mil per year. Not that we can't have both. To me, WR's are close to a dime a dozen. A lot of them are interchangable and they rely on opportunity to succeed. Why not go young and get someone huge like Monk to take over. He might not make the immediate impact you look for, but his 2nd and 3rd seasons could be big for us. Plus all the money we save could go to much more needed positions. I want this kid...and how cool would it be for us to have another successful wr named Monk?
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: The Official draft Marcus Monk thread.
I love it! A couple of weeks ago I casually mentioned Devin Thomas and a groundswell of Thomas' supporters arose. Same thing might be happening now with Monk
![]() I'd rather have Monk just because I think we can get him later and fill other needs earlier in the draft Good thread ![]() Wrong forum though, moving it
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 51
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: The Official draft Marcus Monk thread.
Quote:
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
|
Re: The Official draft Marcus Monk thread.
How about that James Hardy kid from Indiana if he were there in the 2nd? Though I suspect a guy with that size/speed/production will probably slip into the first once scouts get excited about him.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: The Official draft Marcus Monk thread.
he's a 1st rounder, he ran a 4.5 at 6'5"+. so he might not even be there with our first pick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: The Official draft Marcus Monk thread.
Quote:
2008 NFL Scouting Combine Stats: Receivers Marcus Monk, Arkansas, 4.57, 222lbs, 6'4.25", 9 reps. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 37
Posts: 14,189
|
Re: The Official draft Marcus Monk thread.
Quote:
So negative LOL But if we get that extra third round pick he could be an option.
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: The Official draft Marcus Monk thread.
i think i mentioned him about a month ago
![]() he's a good 7th round pick, he does NOT have good speed, and he's not a great WR, but he can block well (lots of practice blocking for mcfadden), he is big, and he'd be great on teams. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: The Official draft Marcus Monk thread.
Quote:
![]() Seriously though, yeah you and I think maybe SBXVII were the early adopters to Monk 2.0 (is that blasphemous) In that 5th-6th round I like Monk, Hubbard, and that kid from Duquesne. Mario Urrutia might not be awful either.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 47
Posts: 5,829
|
Re: The Official draft Marcus Monk thread.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: The Official draft Marcus Monk thread.
If we pick a WR in the first two rounds I like Thomas or Kelly; rounds 2-4: Bennett and Caldwell; 5-7: Hubbard is probably my favorite in those rounds. But again, I think Monk wouldn't really be a waste in those late rounds.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 335
|
Re: The Official draft Marcus Monk thread.
Quote:
You can get lucky with a Bradshaw, Colston or Houshmanzadah in the 7th. It's a crapshoot though, odds are not good.
__________________
Optimism can make you look stupid, but cynicism always makes you look cynical. - Calum Fisher |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 51
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: The Official draft Marcus Monk thread.
Quote:
4.57 is good speed. Not great, but good. He has very good hands, I've watched him. Kinda funny that ESPN has him at 6'6" but the combine has him at 6'4" and change. A guy that is just about 6'5" and has good hands as well as decent speed (still building speed up after the knee injury) is a steal for someone.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: The Official draft Marcus Monk thread.
oh yeah, also from ncaa stat database, his full statlines from arkansas:
NCAA DIVISION I FOOTBALL if you notice, he did have a 962yd year, but he tended to beat up on south carolina and vandy, so... |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: The Official draft Marcus Monk thread.
You can count me on this Bandwagon. Someone did mention him a month ago and I liked the idea. Not only in name but he does seem to be a good WR. I would also look at Manley Jr. in a later round also if possible. He may turn out to be a diamond in the rough.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|