Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Holt released by Rams

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-13-2009, 10:13 PM   #1
SFREDSKIN
Living Legend
 
SFREDSKIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
Holt released by Rams

Sooner or later someone was going to post this.

The Rams release wide receiver Torry Holt on Friday - ESPN
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs.

Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory.

Darrell Green- Best DB ever.


Purveyor of fine Filth
SFREDSKIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 10:34 PM   #2
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: Holt released by Rams

If we can get him for the right price, I say go for it. Our Wr corp sucks and the jury is out whether these rooks are ever going to pan out for another year or two.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 11:27 PM   #3
skinsnut
Playmaker
 
skinsnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,900
Re: Holt released by Rams

Getting Holt would be far more impressive to me than getting Haynesworth.
I really don't know if it is feasible though..It sure would be cool!
I can dream cant I?
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period
skinsnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2009, 09:26 PM   #4
terpsez11
Camp Scrub
 
terpsez11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 54
Re: Holt released by Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
If we can get him for the right price, I say go for it. Our Wr corp sucks and the jury is out whether these rooks are ever going to pan out for another year or two.
I love it how predictable this has all become...we see somebody on the waiver wire and think wow..he'd be a great fit..

we have guys with an upside..and fans that are so impatient

in practically every case the difference between a rookie and a second year receiver is huge..will they pan out?..who knows?..I say worry about Campbell and if he even possesses the ability to have people improve around him..

Linking all three of last season's drafted receivers unilaterally flat out is wrong..
terpsez11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 11:27 PM   #5
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,576
Re: Holt released by Rams

Pass.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 11:33 PM   #6
skinsnut
Playmaker
 
skinsnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,900
Re: Holt released by Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Pass.
Why would you say that...our offense sucks...Holt is fantastic...is it because of the money we'd have to pay to get him?
Are you in love with ARE or the other nobodys?
Imagine Moss and Holt while grooming the rookies...odds are 1 of em wont make it.
It is arguable that Holt is better than Moss

He is a high impact player...one that I believe we should go after hard
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period
skinsnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2009, 12:00 AM   #7
vallin21
The Starter
 
vallin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,177
Re: Holt released by Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsnut View Post
Why would you say that...our offense sucks...Holt is fantastic...is it because of the money we'd have to pay to get him?
Are you in love with ARE or the other nobodys?
Imagine Moss and Holt while grooming the rookies...odds are 1 of em wont make it.
It is arguable that Holt is better than Moss

He is a high impact player...one that I believe we should go after hard
Are you really serious? Holt is 33 and ain't getting any younger. We have two young WR'S that need to prove their worth. It makes no sense to get Holt, were not in fantasy football. Our offense does not suck, and Holt it is not even close to Moss talent wise. Seriously dude, quit grabbin on Holt's jock, HE'S NOT THAT GOOD!! There's a reason why the Rams didn't pay the roster bonus to keep him. That alone should tell you something.

vallin21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2009, 12:11 AM   #8
Zerohero
Impact Rookie
 
Zerohero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: phoenix, az
Age: 46
Posts: 901
Re: Holt released by Rams

Is "Roster Bonus Year" code for "year he will get cut no matter"? Seems like most teams would keep some veterans or at least not go through the motions of cutting just to resign if there were no roster bonus provisions.
Zerohero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2009, 12:16 AM   #9
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,576
Re: Holt released by Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by vallin21 View Post
Are you really serious? Holt is 33 and ain't getting any younger. We have two young WR'S that need to prove their worth. It makes no sense to get Holt, were not in fantasy football. Our offense does not suck, and Holt it is not even close to Moss talent wise. Seriously dude, quit grabbin on Holt's jock, HE'S NOT THAT GOOD!! There's a reason why the Rams didn't pay the roster bonus to keep him. That alone should tell you something.

I agree. We've got two young WRs to develop, it doesn't make much sense to chase an aging WR who has clearly lost a step. We have other more pressing needs.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2009, 11:45 AM   #10
RedskinPete
The Starter
 
RedskinPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Camino,Ca
Posts: 1,174
Re: Holt released by Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
I agree. We've got two young WRs to develop, it doesn't make much sense to chase an aging WR who has clearly lost a step. We have other more pressing needs.
Has he lost a step? I don't know that. He played for a very bad team that beat the Skins 19-17. A home game at that. Kelly knees I am not sold on and most likly was a bad pick. Thomas I hope makes it. As for Holt I love to see if he has anything left but we don't have the cash anyway. Dose Pace have anything left? If he did could he move over to RT for a few years?
RedskinPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 02:33 AM   #11
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: Holt released by Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
I agree. We've got two young WRs to develop, it doesn't make much sense to chase an aging WR who has clearly lost a step. We have other more pressing needs.

Two young Wrs that are more than likely going to be Taylor Jacobs redux, not to mention a shorty in Moss that is getting banged up, and ARE that is unreliable. Face it, Holt is an upgrade even with his age.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2009, 01:53 AM   #12
skinsnut
Playmaker
 
skinsnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,900
Re: Holt released by Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by vallin21 View Post
Are you really serious? Holt is 33 and ain't getting any younger. We have two young WR'S that need to prove their worth. It makes no sense to get Holt, were not in fantasy football. Our offense does not suck, and Holt it is not even close to Moss talent wise. Seriously dude, quit grabbin on Holt's jock, HE'S NOT THAT GOOD!! There's a reason why the Rams didn't pay the roster bonus to keep him. That alone should tell you something.

I know Holt's age...he's got 3 solid years left...he is a 7 time probowler...the rookies have shown zero so far and ARE is average at best...yes Moss is solid...if he is on the field...if he goes down we have no WR threats...
and the offense does suck...what...I think 28th in the league or something?
How's that good?

Holt hasn't missed a game ....EVER...keep that in mind.
He is rock solid and I'm telling you...if the Eagles or Dallas get's him, they are instantly better...we would be too...just because Taylor didn't do well, doesn't mean Holt wouldn't...I bet if you were offered Holt prior to last year yardage drop, you'd be humping his leg....be realistic...there is NO chance either of the Rookies will ever reach Holts level....quite frankly, I doubt Moss will either...and no way ARE even belongs in the same sentance.
Holt is solid...he would make the WR team instantly better...unless you think Thrash is our clutch vet that can train up the rookies....Duh back to you.
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period
skinsnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2009, 10:15 AM   #13
vallin21
The Starter
 
vallin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,177
Re: Holt released by Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsnut View Post
I know Holt's age...he's got 3 solid years left...he is a 7 time probowler...the rookies have shown zero so far and ARE is average at best...yes Moss is solid...if he is on the field...if he goes down we have no WR threats...
and the offense does suck...what...I think 28th in the league or something?
How's that good?

Holt hasn't missed a game ....EVER...keep that in mind.
He is rock solid and I'm telling you...if the Eagles or Dallas get's him, they are instantly better...we would be too...just because Taylor didn't do well, doesn't mean Holt wouldn't...I bet if you were offered Holt prior to last year yardage drop, you'd be humping his leg....be realistic...there is NO chance either of the Rookies will ever reach Holts level....quite frankly, I doubt Moss will either...and no way ARE even belongs in the same sentance.
Holt is solid...he would make the WR team instantly better...unless you think Thrash is our clutch vet that can train up the rookies....Duh back to you.
Sometimes I'm glad fans aren't GM's because we'd really suck. First off the reason why our offense "sucked" was because our pass pro was awful, it was not the receivers fault. Many people have already said this, you have to give Kelley and Thomas a chance to develope, 1 year is not enough. Don't you realize WR is not a need? What does that tell Thomas and Kelley if we got Holt? You were probably one of those guys that wanted TO in DC. He's 33 and declining it makes no sense to sign him considering he played in the spread O not the WCO. What's up with this love fetish w/ Holt? WE'RE NOT PLAYING FANTASY FOOTBALL DUDE!!! You can't have every big name FA that gets released, you have to be realistic, IT'S NOT GONNA HAPPEN BUDDY!
vallin21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 11:53 PM   #14
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: Holt released by Rams

if you could get holt or harrison in super cheap, it might be worthwhile to have them help the rookies... i don't know how much they'd want though.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2009, 01:15 AM   #15
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,343
Re: Holt released by Rams

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy View Post
if you could get holt or harrison in super cheap, it might be worthwhile to have them help the rookies... i don't know how much they'd want though.
The only thing that's going to help the young guys are themselves. They've already got two pros in front of them in Moss and ARE. I don't think we need Holt or Harrison.
skinsfan69 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.04371 seconds with 10 queries