QB Poll

MTK · 10-17-2004, 05:06 PM

vote and discuss

MTK · 10-17-2004, 05:07 PM

It's time, Gibbs please pull the trigger on this

Duffman003 · 10-17-2004, 05:08 PM

if anyone votes Tim Hasselback they don't really like the Redskins.

ZackMills · 10-17-2004, 05:08 PM

mark all the way

aehs77 · 10-17-2004, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZackMills

mark all the way

You know Ramsey's first name is Patrick right

monk81 · 10-17-2004, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duffman003

if anyone votes Tim Hasselback they don't really like the Redskins.

Hey maybe a vote for Tim was a vote for his wife........

SUNRA · 10-17-2004, 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duffman003

if anyone votes Tim Hasselback they don't really like the Redskins.

Anybody that votes for Ramsey wants the sack and interception stats to increase with great velocity. Take all polls you want Ramsey's not playing until Brunell is carried off of the field. Now you're definitely are not a Redskins fan if you wish this on Brunell.

That Guy · 10-17-2004, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SUNRA

Anybody that votes for Ramsey wants the sack and interception stats to increase with great velocity. Take all polls you want Ramsey's not playing until Brunell is carried off of the field. Now you're definitely are not a Redskins fan if you wish this on Brunell.

once again, ramsey has a higer TD/game and lower TD/turnover ratio, has a higher yard per play average AND gives up about 28 less points... and i honestly doubt he'd get sacked much more, the oline has been much much much better than last year. so that arguement is dead, and brunell still sucks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SUNRA

I have defended Brunell too. What I noticed about Brunell's passes that seemed to be thrown out of bounds, 1) Coles was pushed out of bounds and tried to come back in to catch it,so that's a no winner. 2) Was the play when Coles was wide open and it looked like the ball was deflected. Brunell missed bad on that one if that wasn't a deflection. The O line is still struggling. Lastly, you will agree that the play calling is too conservative but understandably so. No Oline, no strong QB = the running game, but let's see some screens or slant passet across the middle. Wait a minute I don't know about that one. Let's keep Portis in the groove.

the Oline was above average today, and the running game was there, you can't blame brunell's sucking on either of those factors this week, he sucked hard and all on his own... even i could see wide open receivers often... the play calling asked for deep passes, which were only about 4 miles off target... the play calling was conservative cause the QB couldn't hit anything over 10 yards... it was conservative because IT HAD TO BE, brunell was too crappy to open anything up.

2 games in a row, less than 100 yards passing, averaging 7 points given up per game, under 40% completion rate, about 4 yards per play... he's done, bench him... goodbye.

aehs77 · 10-17-2004, 05:08 PM

Gibbs Is standing by his man But it needs to stop

redwagonskins · 10-17-2004, 05:09 PM

Brunell gives up more TD's than our D. They don't trust him to make critical throws.

dragontat7169 · 10-17-2004, 05:09 PM

Hey Matty...

Honestly, I think Ramsey should be at the helm. Brunell has been a multimillion dollar mistake in my opinion. At least with Ramsey our expectations aren't as high, so the disappointment will be minimal. Ramsey needs the experience and is not getting it on the bench..but I have said that before. Actually I would rather have Hasslebeck (however you spell it) than Brunell. He has not impressed me and is not worth the 22 million. At least he didn't make any mistakes this game.

Gmanc711 · 10-17-2004, 05:10 PM

Brunell sucks, I dont knwo if it will happen this week, since we won. However, he gives these teams hope, and really ruins our momentum. And if I see him throw the ball out of bounds one more time...... I'm going to kill myself. Whatever. I'm happy though we won. At the begining of the game, he played alright, but he gives the other teams too much of a chance. Go with Ramsey.

Jamaican'Skin · 10-17-2004, 05:13 PM

I have not been impressed with Brunnel. Its your turn Pat

LRT · 10-17-2004, 05:14 PM

Against a team with any kind of passing game we'd be 1-5 thanks to Mark Brunell. Mark is nice guy and Gibbs kind of guy, but he has to take a seat. Let's see what Patrick Ramsey can do with a running game to help him out.

RedskinRat · 10-17-2004, 05:15 PM

ZackMills is Mark Brunell. You never see them in the same place together, right?

View Poll Results: Who should start week 8 against the Packers?
Ramsey	68	70.83%
Brunell	19	19.79%
Hasselbeck	9	9.38%
Voters: 96. You may not vote on this poll

10-17-2004, 05:06 PM	#1
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,576	QB Poll vote and discuss

10-17-2004, 05:10 PM	#12
Gmanc711 Thank You, Sean. Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Gaithersburg, MD Age: 39 Posts: 7,506	Brunell sucks, I dont knwo if it will happen this week, since we won. However, he gives these teams hope, and really ruins our momentum. And if I see him throw the ball out of bounds one more time...... I'm going to kill myself. Whatever. I'm happy though we won. At the begining of the game, he played alright, but he gives the other teams too much of a chance. Go with Ramsey. __________________ #21

10-17-2004, 05:07 PM	#2
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,576	It's time, Gibbs please pull the trigger on this

10-17-2004, 05:08 PM	#3
Duffman003 Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 602	if anyone votes Tim Hasselback they don't really like the Redskins.

10-17-2004, 05:08 PM	#4
ZackMills Registered User Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 176	mark all the way

10-17-2004, 05:08 PM	#9
aehs77 Special Teams Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: silver spring Age: 39 Posts: 486	Gibbs Is standing by his man But it needs to stop

10-17-2004, 05:09 PM	#10
redwagonskins Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: San Diego Posts: 685	Brunell gives up more TD's than our D. They don't trust him to make critical throws.

10-17-2004, 05:09 PM	#11
dragontat7169 Camp Scrub Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 92	Hey Matty... Honestly, I think Ramsey should be at the helm. Brunell has been a multimillion dollar mistake in my opinion. At least with Ramsey our expectations aren't as high, so the disappointment will be minimal. Ramsey needs the experience and is not getting it on the bench..but I have said that before. Actually I would rather have Hasslebeck (however you spell it) than Brunell. He has not impressed me and is not worth the 22 million. At least he didn't make any mistakes this game.

10-17-2004, 05:13 PM	#13
Jamaican'Skin The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Kingston, Jamaica Age: 38 Posts: 2,418	I have not been impressed with Brunnel. Its your turn Pat

10-17-2004, 05:14 PM	#14
LRT Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Springfield, VA Age: 58 Posts: 174	Against a team with any kind of passing game we'd be 1-5 thanks to Mark Brunell. Mark is nice guy and Gibbs kind of guy, but he has to take a seat. Let's see what Patrick Ramsey can do with a running game to help him out.

10-17-2004, 05:15 PM	#15
RedskinRat Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: I'm in LA, trick! Posts: 8,700	ZackMills is Mark Brunell. You never see them in the same place together, right?

QB Poll

Locker Room Main Forum