Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-23-2009, 04:49 PM   #1
PennSkinsFan
Impact Rookie
 
PennSkinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 54
Posts: 752
Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

http://dcprosportsreport.com/2009/12/23/46-mocks-bradford-remains-pick-for-redskins.html



Quote:
This is the largest amount of Mocks the Database has munched together for it’s Top 6 leaders. There are a total of 46 mock drafts updated from DEC 16 through today DEC 23.


When looking at the Washington Redskins, most mocks have the Redskins projected on the Draft Order, at #6. Some have the Redskins at #7. Either way, we have you covered.
__________________
DC Pro Sports Report - Home of the Internet's Largest NFL Mock Draft Database. Best Redskins Redskins discussion, theWarpath.net

PennSkinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2009, 07:47 PM   #2
Drift Reality
Impact Rookie
 
Drift Reality's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 506
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

I think Bradford is actually a good pick if A) Okung is not available or B) there isn't a trade-down offer on the table that would allow them to move back to 11-15 and pick up an additional day 1 pick (or some other scenario that would allow them to expand their draft)
Drift Reality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2009, 09:05 PM   #3
CultBrennan59
Pro Bowl
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drift Reality View Post
I think Bradford is actually a good pick if A) Okung is not available or B) there isn't a trade-down offer on the table that would allow them to move back to 11-15 and pick up an additional day 1 pick (or some other scenario that would allow them to expand their draft)
I agree 100%
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2009, 09:09 PM   #4
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,341
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drift Reality View Post
I think Bradford is actually a good pick if A) Okung is not available or B) there isn't a trade-down offer on the table that would allow them to move back to 11-15 and pick up an additional day 1 pick (or some other scenario that would allow them to expand their draft)
Bradford will only be a good pick if he drops down to the 2nd round and we address other areas of need. I would prefer not to put this guy in a position to start, let him ride the pine, and make sure his shoulder doesn't bust up again.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2009, 11:10 PM   #5
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drift Reality View Post
I think Bradford is actually a good pick if A) Okung is not available or B) there isn't a trade-down offer on the table that would allow them to move back to 11-15 and pick up an additional day 1 pick (or some other scenario that would allow them to expand their draft)
Agreed. If the Redskins pick at #6 and Okung is already gone then there really isn't a good OT available that high. We can still address the line during the rest of the draft.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2009, 08:44 PM   #6
Texanskin
Special Teams
 
Texanskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Skins fan in the Dallas area
Posts: 187
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

if we draft Bradford..this means we didn't address the line...which means the next QB behind center in 2010 will have to be a tough SOB since the line will get you killed...Bradfords shoulder has proven this would be a MISTAKE. KEEP the tough guy Campbell..draft OL with 1st three possible picks
__________________
We are finally looking like a respectable opponent.....Lets keep it going!!!
Texanskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2009, 01:46 AM   #7
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texanskin View Post
if we draft Bradford..this means we didn't address the line...which means the next QB behind center in 2010 will have to be a tough SOB since the line will get you killed...Bradfords shoulder has proven this would be a MISTAKE. KEEP the tough guy Campbell..draft OL with 1st three possible picks
Bradford will get crushed with that bum shoulder. It would be a disaster just as big as Heath Schuler!!!!!
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2009, 01:47 AM   #8
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,137
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
Bradford will get crushed with that bum shoulder. It would be a disaster just as big as Heath Schuler!!!!!
Bradford is mobile, Great athlete kind of like Romo is, I would love to draft him and then draft the rest on oline..
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2009, 03:26 AM   #9
Redskin Warrior
The Starter
 
Redskin Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,544
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
Bradford will get crushed with that bum shoulder. It would be a disaster just as big as Heath Schuler!!!!!
Yeah he was getting hit by boys in college, his shoulder doesn't want to see Tuck, Osi, Trent Cole, Ware & Ratliff twice a year.
__________________
WIN, LOSE OR DRAW I'M A DIE-HARD REDSKIN FAN!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
First they ban winning...now this?
Redskin Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2009, 08:21 PM   #10
#56fanatic
The Starter
 
#56fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 50
Posts: 1,801
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

I sure hope that Bruce does what he wants to do instead of Danny. This has Danny all over it. He has been trying to get Campbell out of here for the last two years. A smart GM builds the lines first. You can't have a competative team with swinging gates infront of the QB. Look what parcells did in Miami. Built solid lines, won with Pennington, won with who ever the guy is now, running the ball with Ricky POT HEAD Williams and is fighing for playoffs this year after winning 10 games last year.

If we take a QB in the first couple of rounds it will be a disaster. Its horrible to think the people on this website know more about how to successfully build a team than the guys that actually get paid to do it.
#56fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2009, 08:13 AM   #11
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
Bradford will get crushed with that bum shoulder. It would be a disaster just as big as Heath Schuler!!!!!
Like Brees' bum shoulder?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2009, 01:21 PM   #12
Redskin Warrior
The Starter
 
Redskin Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,544
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Like Brees' bum shoulder?
Even with this coming up draft i don't think that we can address the line like we should, it will take 2-3 years IMO. If you ask me we need to replace everybody but Dock. Plus you have other positions you need to address LB (Keep Rak at DE he struggles in coverage), RB (Portis replacement), CB (If you don't sign Rogers back you can't depend on Smoot, Westbrook, Tryon or Barnes to start the season next year), S (I think you need to permanently move Landry back to SS he plays better there leaving a hole at FS). Now i do understand that FA will play a role in this but realistically all this areas will not be fixed in 1 draft or free agency. So i believe that if you choose Bradford you have to play him immediately nowadays he would be getting paid to much not too. The line will still be suspect and i don't think he has the toughness to take poundings with a rebuilding franchise. Plus San Diego had a o-line and Brees took shots but not like JC is on 3 step drops. We won't be superbowl contenders moreless NFC East Champs next year it will take some time. Bradford needs a stable organization to protect him somewhere like Jacksonville.
__________________
WIN, LOSE OR DRAW I'M A DIE-HARD REDSKIN FAN!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
First they ban winning...now this?
Redskin Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2009, 11:30 PM   #13
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Like Brees' bum shoulder?
Exactly, I mean lets face it. Bradford is going to be the Redskins QB of the future. We will draft offensive lineman, theres no need to worry about that. Remember Vinny isn't in charge anymore so the O-Line will no longer be overlooked. With that said I wonder what the Rams will do.

By the way Smoot, what do you know about Clausen being selected near the top of the draft. Right now he seems to be graded as a late first round pick by Scouts Inc.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 03:09 PM   #14
44Deezel
The Starter
 
44Deezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texanskin View Post
if we draft Bradford..this means we didn't address the line...which means the next QB behind center in 2010 will have to be a tough SOB since the line will get you killed...Bradfords shoulder has proven this would be a MISTAKE. KEEP the tough guy Campbell..draft OL with 1st three possible picks
Are you saying the only way to address the O line is to use our first pick to draft a linemen? I'm pretty sure we get more than 1 pick, and I believe free agency still exists. If they do draft Bradford, I hope it's not with the guarantee that he'll start on day 1. Maybe they bring in someone like Hasselback or re-sign Campbell. BUT taking a shot at QB with the first pick isn't ridiculous. The Chargers drafted Philip Rivers while Drew Brees was their QB.
44Deezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 05:20 PM   #15
SKINS73
Special Teams
 
SKINS73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 190
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44Deezel View Post
BUT taking a shot at QB with the first pick isn't ridiculous. The Chargers drafted Philip Rivers while Drew Brees was their QB.
They also weren't starting 2nd and 3rd string offensive lineman and they already had a young premier running back in LT. They probably could afford to gamble on a QB.
SKINS73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.05618 seconds with 10 queries