Brandon or T.O. ?

SOUL-SKINS · 03-26-2010, 12:56 PM

This is just speculation at this point but very interesting. Obvisouly Brandon Marshall is the better option but he comes with a huge price tag. We will instantly have a true #1 receiver.........and then there is TO. I dunno. I think we would give up way to much for Marshall.

Redskins Insider - Shanahan interested in Terrell Owens or Brandon Marshall?

freddyg12 · 03-26-2010, 01:03 PM

IF we must, Marshal w/out a doubt!

Skinny Tee · 03-26-2010, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddyg12

IF we must, Marshal w/out a doubt!

Id rather have TO.

He's a free agent and wouldn't cost us our most precious renewing resource that is our draft picks.

doughtydoubter · 03-26-2010, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skinny Tee

Id rather have TO.

He's a free agent and wouldn't cost us our most precious renewing resource that is our draft picks.

good point

Monkeydad · 03-26-2010, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skinny Tee

Id rather have TO.

He's a free agent and wouldn't cost us our most precious renewing resource that is our draft picks.

Plus, less problems with our HC.

Owens drops a lot of passes but has seemed to have actually grown up, maturity-wise.

Longtimefan · 03-26-2010, 01:04 PM

Marshall would vastly improve the receiver corps and would be a good addition. He's tendered at one and I doubt we'd trade our number one for him. Depending on how bad they want him, something could be worked out.

I would say no to TO under any circumstance.

BigHairedAristocrat · 03-26-2010, 01:07 PM

I dont want either, but if we had to have one of them, i'd actually prefer T.O. to my knowledge, he was pretty much a model citizen and buffalo and the general lack of interest in him around the league should be humbling. the chance to play the cowboys and eagles 4 times a year should be extra motivation for him. obviously, marshall is younger and has more long-term potential, but he's also just as much of a knucklehead as T.O. The advantage with T.O. is that he'd be cheaper and wouldnt cost us any draft picks.

KLHJ2 · 03-26-2010, 01:36 PM

I dont think that WR is enough of a need for the FO to make a move for either guy. This whole speculation would seem completely bogus in my mind.

I say take neither and suffer the consequences for not playing along.

Longtimefan · 03-26-2010, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angry

I dont think that WR is enough of a need for the FO to make a move for either guy. This whole speculation would seem completely bogus in my mind.

I say take neither and suffer the consequences for not playing along.

We don't have much by way of a proven commodity except for Moss. I could see it being a concern, but to what extent they choose to act on it is a completely different story......TO is looking to improve on 6 mil. and I doubt that's going to happen here.

McD5 · 03-26-2010, 01:52 PM

I would love to see us ship a player out, or some combination of a player and low round draft pick for Marshall.

A TE maybe? Landry? Anything like that would work.

Lotus · 03-26-2010, 02:01 PM

I cannot fathom the continuing talk about Brandon Marshall and the Redskins. Shanny wanted to ditch him in Denver. Therefore Shanny is not bringing him to Washington. End of story, it seems to me.

As for TO, I don't want him taking playing time from Thomas and Kelly.

skinsfaninok · 03-26-2010, 02:08 PM

I would take Marshall only if we gave Denver our 2011 1st round pick not this years first rder. The guy is easilly a top 3 WR behind fitz and a.Johnson . He gets 100 rec every year.

SBXVII · 03-26-2010, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McD5

I would love to see us ship a player out, or some combination of a player and low round draft pick for Marshall.

A TE maybe? Landry? Anything like that would work.

For some reason I pictured the Rams fans saying.....

"I'll take Jason Campbell, I'd would love to see us ship a player out and a low round draft pick for Campbell."

and right about now you guys are saying...."Hell no! Jason is worth more then that. We want a 1st round draft pick." Then their is the more reality based fans who would be saying "We'll take a second or a third round draft pick."

My point. Denver wants a 1st round draft pick for one of the elite WR's in the league. Not a 1st for a mediocre QB or middle of the road WR.

SmootSmack · 03-26-2010, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBXVII

For some reason I pictured the Rams fans saying.....

"I'll take Jason Campbell, I'd would love to see us ship a player out and a low round draft pick for Campbell."

and right about now you guys are saying...."Hell no! Jason is worth more then that. We want a 1st round draft pick." Then their is the more reality based fans who would be saying "We'll take a second or a third round draft pick."

My point. Denver wants a 1st round draft pick for one of the elite WR's in the league. Not a 1st for a mediocre QB or middle of the road WR.

But no one wants to give them that. Just like the Redskins want at least a 3rd for JC, but no one wants to give them that

McD5 · 03-26-2010, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBXVII

For some reason I pictured the Rams fans saying.....

"I'll take Jason Campbell, I'd would love to see us ship a player out and a low round draft pick for Campbell."

and right about now you guys are saying...."Hell no! Jason is worth more then that. We want a 1st round draft pick." Then their is the more reality based fans who would be saying "We'll take a second or a third round draft pick."

My point. Denver wants a 1st round draft pick for one of the elite WR's in the league. Not a 1st for a mediocre QB or middle of the road WR.

I'd take a 4th, maybe even a 5th for JC. Being realistic. I hate to trade draft picks.

03-26-2010, 01:03 PM	#2
freddyg12 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 4,540	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? IF we must, Marshal w/out a doubt!

03-26-2010, 01:04 PM	#6
Longtimefan Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Germantown, Md. Posts: 4,832	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? Marshall would vastly improve the receiver corps and would be a good addition. He's tendered at one and I doubt we'd trade our number one for him. Depending on how bad they want him, something could be worked out. I would say no to TO under any circumstance.

03-26-2010, 01:07 PM	#7
BigHairedAristocrat Playmaker Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 4,712	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? I dont want either, but if we had to have one of them, i'd actually prefer T.O. to my knowledge, he was pretty much a model citizen and buffalo and the general lack of interest in him around the league should be humbling. the chance to play the cowboys and eagles 4 times a year should be extra motivation for him. obviously, marshall is younger and has more long-term potential, but he's also just as much of a knucklehead as T.O. The advantage with T.O. is that he'd be cheaper and wouldnt cost us any draft picks. __________________ Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things.

03-26-2010, 01:36 PM	#8
KLHJ2 Inactive Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: DC Metro Area Age: 46 Posts: 5,829	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? I dont think that WR is enough of a need for the FO to make a move for either guy. This whole speculation would seem completely bogus in my mind. I say take neither and suffer the consequences for not playing along.

03-26-2010, 01:52 PM	#10
McD5 Camp Scrub Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Florida Posts: 35	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? I would love to see us ship a player out, or some combination of a player and low round draft pick for Marshall. A TE maybe? Landry? Anything like that would work.

03-26-2010, 12:56 PM	#1
SOUL-SKINS Impact Rookie Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Connecticut Posts: 896	Brandon or T.O. ? This is just speculation at this point but very interesting. Obvisouly Brandon Marshall is the better option but he comes with a huge price tag. We will instantly have a true #1 receiver.........and then there is TO. I dunno. I think we would give up way to much for Marshall. Redskins Insider - Shanahan interested in Terrell Owens or Brandon Marshall? __________________ TODD COLLINS WILL ALWAYS HOLD A SPECIAL PLACE IN MY HEART

03-26-2010, 02:01 PM	#11
Lotus Fire Bruce NOW Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Hattiesburg, MS Posts: 11,434	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? I cannot fathom the continuing talk about Brandon Marshall and the Redskins. Shanny wanted to ditch him in Denver. Therefore Shanny is not bringing him to Washington. End of story, it seems to me. As for TO, I don't want him taking playing time from Thomas and Kelly. __________________ Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny

03-26-2010, 02:08 PM	#12
skinsfaninok Warpath Hall of Fame Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: UNITED STATES Age: 38 Posts: 36,155	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? I would take Marshall only if we gave Denver our 2011 1st round pick not this years first rder. The guy is easilly a top 3 WR behind fitz and a.Johnson . He gets 100 rec every year. __________________ “Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban

Brandon or T.O. ?

Locker Room Main Forum