|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
12-11-2012, 04:23 PM | #1 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,105
|
Chris Cooley
He's a true Redskin and means so much to the community surrounding the DMV. Once Fred Davis went down with an Achilles injury, Cooley was called by the HC. But since Cooley has been back, he hasn't hardly played due to his lowly position on the depth chart and he hasn't caught a pass this season yet.
I have nothing against Logan Paulsen and I'm sure Mike and Kyle know what they're doing by giving Paulsen playing time and developing him. On most NFL teams though, Cooley would be a starter and Paulsen would be a backing him up. I see the Redskins doing the same thing with Chris Cooley as they did with Mike Sellers last season. I hope Cooley isn't fading out. He should be getting more playing time during games. Thoughts? |
12-11-2012, 04:30 PM | #2 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Chris Cooley
Cooley was brought back as insurance when Fred Davis went down. That's all. He no longer has the wheels to get open and be the playmaker he used to be. He's in there basically for blocking purposes. Don't get me wrong, I love Chris Cooley! I think he was a top notch playmaker for the 'skins at one point, but his time has passed him buy I'm afraid. Logan Paulsen has performed very well for us. He's not as athletic as Fred Davis, but he's made the plays when the 'skins needed him to.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
12-11-2012, 04:44 PM | #3 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,451
|
Re: Chris Cooley
Quote:
|
|
12-11-2012, 04:45 PM | #4 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Chris Cooley
I'm not so concerned about Paulsen getting reps, but the fact Paul sees the field (instead) of Cooley is really dumb. Cooley is better in every facet of the game than Paul.
This is a Mike thing i.e. picking favorites, be they coaches or players, that don't make much sense because you don't see production. It's partly why I doubt he ever achieves much success in pro football again.
__________________
24-34 |
12-11-2012, 04:54 PM | #5 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Chris Cooley
Quote:
Cooley is no longer a big play making threat. He was one of my favorite players, but even I realized Cooley's just not the Chris Cooley that was elusive and was a consistent target for Ramsey, Brunell, and anybody else who played QB for the 'skins from '05 to now. In regards to not seeing production, how much production did you see from Chris Cooley during pre-season? Zilch.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
12-11-2012, 05:07 PM | #6 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Chris Cooley
Quote:
Secondly, Cooley's talent for getting open was never based on speed or quickness (which he has plenty of) but on football IQ, reading the coverage/zone and then dropping into the gaps. Afterwards he's a stud at rumbling for yards after contact. Cooley is a better blocker, route-runner, pass-catcher and far superior after the catch. Paul can run to the sidelines faster lol.
__________________
24-34 |
|
12-11-2012, 05:21 PM | #7 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,451
|
Re: Chris Cooley
Quote:
|
|
12-11-2012, 06:00 PM | #8 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Chris Cooley
Quote:
__________________
24-34 |
|
12-11-2012, 05:27 PM | #9 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,867
|
Re: Chris Cooley
Quote:
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
|
12-11-2012, 05:49 PM | #10 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Age: 36
Posts: 3,438
|
Re: Chris Cooley
Actually, if I recall right, there were few teams who called Cooley about signing him but Cooley said that all those offers/teams didn't feel right for him to accept. He really want to play for Redskins, and only Redskins.
|
12-11-2012, 05:53 PM | #11 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,347
|
Re: Chris Cooley
Wasn't Cooley holding out for a return to Washington or a starting spot?
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
12-11-2012, 11:33 PM | #12 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 152
|
Re: Chris Cooley
Quote:
I think Cooley is also the better receiver but we don't target the TE position that much, so again it is somewhat hard to judge. Paulsen also looks awkward trying to catch the ball. Paulsen is bigger and perhaps he can do a better job with high throws. Bottom line, Paulsen is Mike's guy and so he plays. Coach's prerogative. I would love to see Cooley more, but darn, things have gone so well the last four games, it is hard to get overly excited about the situation. I think Cooley would improve the offense, if he were used more often and effectively, but winning cures most problems so I'm not too worried about the situation! |
|
12-11-2012, 11:48 PM | #13 | |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Chris Cooley
Quote:
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
|
12-12-2012, 12:31 AM | #14 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 152
|
Re: Chris Cooley
Quote:
You are absolutely right about looking stupid. I freely admit that part of the fun of being a fan is projecting yourself into the coach's role, especially for those of us who are too old to even dream about playing. Bottom line, I'm not concerned about it. Nevertheless, Paulsen did look as if he held a lot against the Ravens, but he was only called once or twice. If he can hold and get away with it, then I suppose it qualifies as skillful blockling. |
|
12-11-2012, 04:57 PM | #15 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,564
|
Re: Chris Cooley
Cooley has been on the field plenty. Mostly blocking though.
|
|
|