|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
10-29-2018, 11:16 PM | #1 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Redskins win arbitration hearing against McCloughan
|
10-30-2018, 05:30 AM | #2 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 822
|
Re: Redskins win arbitration hearing against McCloughan
Does this change anybody's opinion on the situation? I still do not like how they handled the issue. I think they could have handled it better.
|
10-30-2018, 06:35 AM | #3 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Beaverdam Virginia
Age: 63
Posts: 2,137
|
Re: Redskins win arbitration hearing against McCloughan
Quote:
I remember Chris Cooley coming on the radio saying McCloughan drinking was a big part of him getting canned and they no longer trusted his decision making. It seems there sure is a lot of ex-players with links to the Redskins sharing information that most other teams try to keep private. |
|
10-30-2018, 08:11 AM | #4 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Stephens City, VA
Posts: 2,947
|
Re: Redskins win arbitration hearing against McCloughan
Do you really believe that Scot M. drank on the job here? I know he had issues with that in the past, but it just seems hard to believe to me, that he was showing up at redskins park drunk. Also keep in mind nobody seemed to mind that there are stories of Dan Snyder drinking crown royal in many of his meetings, as well as Bruce Allen having liquor bottles / accessories freely displayed in his office. I believe more than one poster here said that Bruce Allen brushes his teeth with Coors Light..
__________________
Time to nut up or shut up |
10-30-2018, 10:24 AM | #5 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Beaverdam Virginia
Age: 63
Posts: 2,137
|
Re: Redskins win arbitration hearing against McCloughan
Quote:
What point are you trying to make? Scot M. did not ever get intoxicated on the job? The Redskin front office are hypocrites if he was canned for excessive drinking while on duty? My point was neither of those. It was the fact that an ex player who is employed by the team came out and said Scot M. was canned because of drinking. Whether or not that is true, is irrelevant to the fact most teams would have done anything to keep that behind closed doors. The old standby like "After speaking to Scot we decided it was time to go in a different direction." , would have been used to retain the dignity of the guy shown the door. |
|
10-30-2018, 10:50 AM | #6 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 366
|
Re: Redskins win arbitration hearing against McCloughan
Quote:
|
|
10-30-2018, 11:00 AM | #7 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Beaverdam Virginia
Age: 63
Posts: 2,137
|
Re: Redskins win arbitration hearing against McCloughan
Snyder owns that radio station, I would not just call that a leak by Cooley. Seems like a bad public relations spin that Snyder had knowledge of or did not deem inappropriate. Someone thinking of coming to work for Washington might have a negative view of how things went down.
|
10-30-2018, 02:01 PM | #8 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,319
|
Re: Redskins win arbitration hearing against McCloughan
Quote:
Cooley is Snyders mouthpiece. It was a dick move by Cooley to say that shit on air. |
|
10-30-2018, 08:53 AM | #9 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Parkton, MD
Posts: 5,685
|
Re: Redskins win arbitration hearing against McCloughan
There is a big difference between having a drink and being an alcoholic. Scot M.'s dependency issues are well documented. I don't think it is out of the question to think he struggled while with the Redskins.
|
10-30-2018, 09:11 AM | #10 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Redskins win arbitration hearing against McCloughan
This case settles whether the Redskins had cause in firing him, so if you can’t put 2 and 2 together oh well.
|
10-30-2018, 10:05 AM | #11 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,101
|
Re: Redskins win arbitration hearing against McCloughan
__________________
Touchdown Washington Redskins!!! |
10-30-2018, 11:11 AM | #12 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Parkton, MD
Posts: 5,685
|
Re: Redskins win arbitration hearing against McCloughan
Snyder doesn't own the radio station any more.
|
10-30-2018, 11:26 AM | #13 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Beaverdam Virginia
Age: 63
Posts: 2,137
|
Re: Redskins win arbitration hearing against McCloughan
|
10-30-2018, 02:03 PM | #14 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,319
|
Re: Redskins win arbitration hearing against McCloughan
Quote:
It's no longer ESPN980, it's the Team980. Cooley is no longer part of the team980 but is creating content for the Redskins website and facebook. |
|
10-30-2018, 12:07 PM | #15 |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,468
|
Re: Redskins win arbitration hearing against McCloughan
All this means is that the Redskins were in their rights to fire him. Cooley was the one who started the rumor that he was drinking too much, I'm gonna need some more proof than a former Redskin spouting rumors to believe that was the reason.
Either way, I've since moved on. Best of luck to him elsewhere. |
|
|