Republican nominee for President

[Hog1]

What are your thoughts on this one..........

FBI's Clinton probe expands to public corruption track | Fox News

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/21/us...omen.html?_r=0

[over the mountain]

Originally Posted by Hog1

What are your thoughts on this one..........

FBI's Clinton probe expands to public corruption track | Fox News

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/21/us...omen.html?_r=0

as to the first article:

1. it is old news that clinton used a personal server for State Dept emails. Powell and Rice used a personal server as well. besides, there is no info that her personal server was hacked .. unlike all of the fed server hacks.

2. new news from the article - as best i can infer, it seems there may be a correlation with state dept contracts and people who donated to a clinton charity foundation? vague at this point. ill wait to hear more.

second article:

just complete trashy political attack. i listened to hannity's radio show yesterday and he was hammering home the "point" that hillary clinton is satan who cant be trusted and wants to "destroy" the women who made allegations against billy in the 70's ........ just your typical election time political attacks imo. going back in the past and make huge stretches to connect something to a running mate.

can we really blame obama for palin's son punching his wife and putting a gun to his head?

[Hog1]

.....lol

[Hog1]

Old News?
Translation: ongoing investigation involving 100 FBI agents? Probably nothing.......

And.....it damn sure is trashy. There are woman coming out of the woodwork naming...Good ol' Bill for assaulting them and apparently Good ol' Hill has been covering it for him for lo' these.......many years
Not exactly a recipe for CIC.....



Fox News is told that about 100 special agents assigned to the investigations also were asked to sign non-disclosure agreements, with as many as 50 additional agents on “temporary duty assignment,” or TDY. The request to sign a new NDA could reflect that agents are handling the highly classified material in the emails, or serve as a reminder not to leak about the case, or both.

"The pressure on the lead agents is brutal," a second source said. "Think of it like a military operation, you might need tanks called in along with infantry."

Separately, a former high-ranking State Department official emphasized to Fox News that Clinton’s deliberate non-use of her government email address may be increasingly “significant.”

“It is virtually automatic when one comes on board at the State Department to be assigned an email address,” the source said.

“It would have taken an affirmative act not to have one assigned ... and it would also mean it was all planned out before she took office. This certainly raises questions about the so-called legal advice she claimed to have received from inside the State Department that what she was doing was proper."

[That Guy]

you're basically equating agents investigating her with proof of guilt.

there very well be some shady sh*t going on there, but until the investigation release the results, it's just premature speculation. of course fox news blowhards are going to blow hard. it's all they know how to do.

[Hog1]

If you had over 100 FBI agents investigating you, would you have reason to worry? Would it be unreasonable to assume 100+ FUCKIN FBI AGENTS is reason for serious concern? lol
AND did Fox somehow distort the report? Did they lie? If not for what possible purpose do you bring it up? Is that a defense of some sort in your mind?

[That Guy]

did i say it wasn't reason for concern? did i say fox lied? did i say that was some sort of defense?

once we see the results we'll know the scope. why is my refusal to assume absolute guilt before seeing the actual facts such a problem for you that you feel the need to respond emotionally?

[Hog1]

You....assume a lot. And if you think the FBI would waste that type of manpower on innocence, well that makes you something else as well.

[That Guy]

You....assume a lot.

pot, kettle, black.

if i accuse you of murder, you're obviously guilty right? talk about a rush to judgement. all i said is i'll wait to see the extent of what they find before wildly speculating on speculation. that means i must be a communist, right?

[Hog1]

i'm pretty sure at this point you can hold both sides of the issue by yourself......without interference

[MTK]

Can't make this stuff up

Donald Trump: I could 'shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose voters' - CNNPolitics.com

[MTK]

On a lighter note

Tina Fey’s Sarah Palin Returned to ‘SNL’ to Endorse Trump, and It Was Glorious - The Daily Beast

[Hog1]

Originally Posted by MTK

Can't make this stuff up

Donald Trump: I could 'shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose voters' - CNNPolitics.com

I don't think Political Correctness holds much....sway for him
Thank God.....

[kct1975]

Originally Posted by MTK

On a lighter note

Tina Fey’s Sarah Palin Returned to ‘SNL’ to Endorse Trump, and It Was Glorious - The Daily Beast

Tina Fey is Awesome!

[BaltimoreSkins]

Originally Posted by Hog1

You....assume a lot. And if you think the FBI would waste that type of manpower on innocence, well that makes you something else as well.

Why not? They have a responsibility to get it right no matter guilt or innocence. The number of agents has nothing to do with it. It has more to do with being damn sure they get their report correct due to who they are investigating.