|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-16-2006, 01:53 AM | #31 | ||
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Quote:
Quote:
look at pittsburgh, they have a great defense, and so does denver and carolina chicago's and tampa's offenses were too crappy to survive in the playoffs |
||
Advertisements |
01-16-2006, 09:16 AM | #32 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Southeast
Age: 41
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Quote:
Basically you're arguing that the Redskins are as bad as Dallas?
__________________
Your post count, reputation score, popularity ranking, VIP tag or funny signature has no bearing on how I value you as an individual. |
|
01-16-2006, 10:16 AM | #33 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LaVale MD
Age: 62
Posts: 515
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Quote:
__________________
...skins fan since 72 and still breathin'! |
|
01-16-2006, 10:40 AM | #34 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 9
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Wooped you twice and knocked you out of the playoffs,then you lost to the the Rams no more need to be said...
|
01-16-2006, 10:43 AM | #35 | |
Assistant Regional Mod
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carbondale CO
Age: 44
Posts: 2,958
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Quote:
..... I sense trouble brewing on Brokeback Mountain....
__________________
I am the brute squad. |
|
01-16-2006, 10:54 AM | #36 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rockville
Age: 61
Posts: 795
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
I personnally like the fact you have the nuts to post here, and hopefully you will continue.
Lets clarify a few things. 2nd place is the loser of the Super Bowl. We have finished in 8th place which entiltes us to a lower round draft pick then the cowboys. So finishing worse then us enables you a better draft pick which would mean they are trying to make you a better team by giving you a shot at better players. So really in the NFL we are all not tied when it comes to losing but we are rated based on our record and playoff success. Your offensive play calling was incrediblly inept. JJ is not the back you guys claimed him to be, I would label him a bust. QB should retire as concrete feet is worthless. Oline, this is a major weakness for you all and that is well documented. TE is probally your best player. At WR you guys have one decent guy Glen, and he is starting to get slow. Keeshawn, is not worth arguing cause even our 6th reciever Farris is better and that is not saying much. Who do we need on Offense, a 2nd WR and depth at O-line. Defense, you guys have great young talent but are thin at the LB position. Your coach defiently sucks. We need one more corner and a DE. Well our coach is pretty good. So you gys have alot further to go then us. So keep posting but at least have the courtsey not to trash talk, talk facts and discuss and you might be accepted into this community.
__________________
16-0 for 2007 |
01-17-2006, 05:43 AM | #37 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
sore loser, sour grapes, waste of time.
you weren't here before, convenient of you to show up now. I know you're pissed at your sorry team, but that doesn't make being an arse any less excusable. Grow up. |
01-17-2006, 06:26 AM | #38 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ridgway, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,519
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Quote:
As for offense I think that we are in better shape than Dallas, after all we have a running game with a real running back, not one that just appears when he feels like it. Sure we are now a 1 man show but that is what is great about our situation we only need to find ONE receiver, as opposed to finding a QB, RB, and 2 WR's, because Meshawn and Glenn are not getting any younger and history shows that WR's over like 33 or 34 go down hill fast. :smashfrea :vomit:
__________________
"I am the best at what I do, and what I do isn't very nice" - Sean Taylor |
|
01-17-2006, 10:46 AM | #39 |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
I find this whole post to be "none - sence"
|
01-17-2006, 11:21 AM | #40 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Now I won't say that I don't check other team's boards to see what the general sentiment is, HOWEVER I ESPECIALLY don't post spouting off at the mouth to a team that generally ravaged mine. I'm especially entertained at the fact that this FOOTBALL GAME caused you so much anguish that you decided to seek out a Redskins site just to post some blah-blah crap. It makes me all rainbows and puppy dogs inside to know that someone takes the game so seriously it's ruined the next few months for them because they lost to my favorite team.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|