|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-01-2006, 10:31 AM | #1 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
2004: The draft we should be grading
Handing out grades the day after the draft has always seemed a little silly, it's just a way for all the so called experts to show how much smarter they are than all the NFL GMs and scouts that poured their into lives into the entire draft process for the last 3-4 months.
Let's take a look at the 2004 draft, since we can actually grade that one more fairly now that those players have 2 full seasons under their belts. (I was going to go back to 2003 but since that is pre-Gibbs 2.0 I figured there's not much use in going there.) Here's the 2004 draft class: Sean Taylor - 1st round, 5th overall Chris Cooley - 3rd round pick Mark Wilson - 5th round pick Jim Molinaro - 6th round pick I would give Taylor a solid B or B+, the only thing holding back an A is the off the field crap and the spitting incident. Cooley I would give an A. He's the best tight end/h-back, whatever you want to call him that we've had in a long time. Wilson gets an F, did he ever catch on anywhere else? Molinaro I would give an incomplete, he's still on the roster so that's a plus, but we really don't know what he's capable of since he hasn't seen much action. So all in all, we came away from this draft with two starter with Pro Bowl potential. |
Advertisements |
05-01-2006, 10:36 AM | #2 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading
molinaro gets an f in my book just for the seattle game.a guard by trade the skins opted to put raymer in at guard and the rest is history(bad history at that)
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
05-01-2006, 10:52 AM | #3 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 1,515
|
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading
I think the 2004 draft was most notable because we didnt draft Kellen Winslow in the first round. We waited until the 3rd round to pick up Cooley. And used the "best player available" tactic with Sean. And I would give Sean an A- because of the extracurricular activities.
Looking at the top 2 picks of the draft, I would say that we got a Safety that added much needed bite to our bark. And we picked up an offensive red zone/1st down threat in Chris. With fewer high draft picks this year, our chances of hitting gold are much, much less. |
05-01-2006, 10:53 AM | #4 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Age: 55
Posts: 1,559
|
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading
This thread proves my thinking, that once you get past the 3rd round, it is really difficult for any of these drafted guys to play or make the team. You have thousands of guys who play college ball and only the best become starters or reserves in the NFL. Mcintosh will make our team this year and the rest of Sunday's picks are just real long shots that the regular guys just use to practice against.
|
05-01-2006, 11:02 AM | #5 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,422
|
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading
Sean Taylor's off the field incidents had no bearing on last season. There's no evidence to say that it inhibited his growth. The spitting thing was bad because it got him ejected. But the legal case doesn't enter the equation in my eyes. He's already a great player and he's only two years in. A
Cooley gets an A as well. Even considering what we had to trade to get him, it was worth it. Wilson gets an F. But he was picked so low that it's like getting an F on a little pop quiz that's not even worth 2% of your final grade. Molinaro gets a C. I think if you're a late round pick like he was, and you manage to stick around for a few years, even if you've gotten no playing time, it still says something about you. Can't give him higher than a C though, he hasn't played yet. All in all, it's an A- draft if you ask me.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
05-01-2006, 11:07 AM | #6 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 44
Posts: 368
|
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading
Quote:
|
|
05-01-2006, 11:24 AM | #7 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Camino,Ca
Posts: 1,174
|
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading
Gibbs said that Molinaro will have a larger roll in 06. I hope so. The OL in in need even if he thinks not. I bet he will look at the wire to find a back up or two before the season opener!
|
05-01-2006, 11:24 AM | #8 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Camino,Ca
Posts: 1,174
|
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading
Gibbs said that Molinaro will have a larger roll in 06. I hope so. The OL in in need even if he thinks not. I bet he will look at the wire to find a back up or two before the season opener!
|
05-01-2006, 11:53 AM | #9 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading
They must have some confidence in Molinaro since he has stuck for 2 years and is said to be moving up the depth charts. You don't keep around OLs who simply can't play. Too much risk. I am thinking he can be a adequate reserve for us.
|
05-01-2006, 11:58 AM | #10 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 1,046
|
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading
Molinaro will compete with Lefotu.
|
05-01-2006, 12:35 PM | #11 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 174
|
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading
'04 draft was decent. Taylor and Cooley are solid. Molinaro may still be a contributor.
__________________
Go skins! |
05-01-2006, 12:40 PM | #12 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 1,046
|
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading
Quote:
|
|
05-01-2006, 02:54 PM | #13 |
Propane and propane accessories
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 55
Posts: 4,717
|
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading
Jury is obviously out on Molinaro, but he's coming into his third year under Bugel. We'll know soon. Hopefully he's shown enough progress to provide real depth on the oline.
As for Taylor and Cooley, how can the grade be anything but A and A? Both will be all-pro soon enough, IMO.
__________________
Hail from Houston! |
05-01-2006, 04:44 PM | #14 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Richmond, Va.
Age: 49
Posts: 288
|
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading
I tell you what, I just watched the 05 highlights again for the 5000 time and it should not even be a question about this front office and what they have done although they have missed on some. That highlight clip should say it all on how Gibbs and crew have built this team whether it was average draft or a very good FA signings they have done well. Those big clips of highlights is all ones that many have criticized.
-Trading up for Cooley -Carlos Rogers instead of Mike Williams -Portis is not a power Gibbs back -Cornelius Griffin very good when healthy -Moss is not as good as Coles -Shawn Springs injury prone, been just as dominate as Champ not saying he is Champ, but he filled in well. -Marcus Washington is a beast -Sean Taylor Pro Bowl if keeps his off field issues under control after this ordeal passes -Daniels came on strong the final weeks of the season hopefully it carries over. -Jason Campbell???? Potential to be our franchise QB for a long time, we will see. -Brunell had the best year of his career last year and our first playoff trip since 1999 though many still question his ability Highlight Video is filled with people this group has brought in. |
05-01-2006, 04:47 PM | #15 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 44
Posts: 368
|
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|