Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


2004: The draft we should be grading

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-01-2006, 04:48 PM   #16
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
Handing out grades the day after the draft has always seemed a little silly ...
We hear this a lot around draft time – that it's silly to grade teams on their drafts when nobody has any idea of how these players will perform in the NFL.

But if you're grading drafts based on the information that's available, certainly you can gauge how well each team did collecting players according to their prospective status coming out of college. If this weren't true, then there would be no player rankings; which is something every front office, coaching staff and scouting department in the NFL has.

Grading drafts is fine. You've just got to define what your basing the grade on.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 05-01-2006, 04:55 PM   #17
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven
We hear this a lot around draft time – that it's silly to grade teams on their drafts when nobody has any idea of how these players will perform in the NFL.

But if you're grading drafts based on the information that's available, certainly you can gauge how well each team did collecting players according to their prospective status coming out of college. If this weren't true, then there would be no player rankings; which is something every front office, coaching staff and scouting department in the NFL has.

Grading drafts is fine. You've just got to define what your basing the grade on.
True, I just think it's funny when blowhards in the media get all hyped up like their word on the draft is final and absolute, even before any of these guys put on a NFL uniform.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 06:08 PM   #18
steveo395
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25
molinaro gets an f in my book just for the seattle game.a guard by trade the skins opted to put raymer in at guard and the rest is history(bad history at that)
Molinaro is a tackle
steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 06:16 PM   #19
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading

Quote:
Originally Posted by steveo395
Molinaro is a tackle

Yeah, but he's right. Many tackles get playing time at guard. Coaches sometimes prefer it that way with younger, inexperienced tackles. There could be a future still for Molinaro, Gibbs said so anyway. But if Raymer was the best option after Ray Brown went down -- that doesn't speak well for Molinaro.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.84844 seconds with 12 queries