|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-08-2006, 02:16 PM | #31 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: The Portis move in hindsight
Quote:
|
|
Advertisements |
12-08-2006, 02:17 PM | #32 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: The Portis move in hindsight
Let me throw this out there: If we put Portis on the trading block, can we fetch a first round pick for him?
|
12-08-2006, 02:18 PM | #33 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 46
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: The Portis move in hindsight
Quote:
And I can't even comment on a Kenny Watson reference... |
|
12-08-2006, 02:23 PM | #34 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 53
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: The Portis move in hindsight
I never liked the trade because I thought we gave up to much by adding a draft pick along with the best CB in the league...but Portis has been a great player for the redskins so it's long overdue to let this debate go.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
12-08-2006, 02:25 PM | #35 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: The Portis move in hindsight
Quote:
As it was stated earlier, good point I might add, the pick was kind of a moot point, because Champ was leaving anyway. The second round pick jus ensured that Portis was more or less really coming to D.C. |
|
12-08-2006, 02:28 PM | #36 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,281
|
Re: The Portis move in hindsight
Quote:
|
|
12-08-2006, 02:30 PM | #37 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 46
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: The Portis move in hindsight
Quote:
|
|
12-08-2006, 02:31 PM | #38 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: The Portis move in hindsight
|
12-08-2006, 02:31 PM | #39 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,281
|
Re: The Portis move in hindsight
He might be on the block because Betts is now getting paid starter money. He would command more than a 1st rounder. I would trade him for a 1st rounder and a starter. Texans would be a perfect team. Kubiak coached him in Den.
|
12-08-2006, 02:31 PM | #40 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,508
|
Re: The Portis move in hindsight
We knew Champ wanted to leave which meant everyone who we would be trading with knew as well. The "other team" had the upper hand in negotiations.
__________________
"I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn |
12-08-2006, 02:31 PM | #41 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: The Portis move in hindsight
Golston, Montgomery, Evans, Boschetti...we have some decent young talent.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
12-08-2006, 02:33 PM | #42 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 53
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: The Portis move in hindsight
Yes, champ was leaving but we did own his rights and could have held out for a more fair trade from Denver or someoen else. When the redskins decide they want something they throw in whatever is necessary to make sure it happens that instant. All of the Redskins problems since Snyder came aboard have involved a general lack of patience. Snyders wants to win yesterday which is what we like most about him but that mindset has been a cloud over the Redskins decision making process.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
12-08-2006, 02:37 PM | #43 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 40
Posts: 937
|
Re: The Portis move in hindsight
Denver is desparate for a quaility back right now like portis. If they had portis I think they would have at least 1 or 2 more wins. I really would like to hold on to both portis and betts considering how much of a "running team" the redskins are supposed to be. Running the ball 30+ times a game is gonna require more than one QUALITY back.
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
12-08-2006, 02:38 PM | #44 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,281
|
Re: The Portis move in hindsight
Of course not. But you don't give up two starters for one. If your going to make that trade then we are the ones who should have gotten the better end of the deal. If not then Gibbs should have sat Bailey down and told him things are gonna change. Or they should have just paid the man and not traded him at all. Some of it was over money. They pay everyone else so why not Bailey? You already know he can ball. So you go out and pay AA and AC but not the best corner in the league? C'mon.
|
12-08-2006, 02:42 PM | #45 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,281
|
Re: The Portis move in hindsight
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|